AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENDERSON, I. W.D.
Right arrow Articles by LOUGHEED, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HENDERSON, I. W.D.
Right arrow Articles by LOUGHEED, M. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 102, 545-551, Copyright © 1968 by American Roentgen Ray Society


CLINICAL EVALUATION OF COMBINED RADIATION AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCIES

I. W.D. HENDERSON M.D., F.R.C.S.(C)1, B. LIPOWSKA L.R.C.P. AND S.I.1, and M. N. LOUGHEED M.D., F.R.C.P.(C)1

1 From the University Surgical Clinic and the Department of Radiation Therapy, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

A series of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies have been studied from the viewpoint of evaluation of response to radiation, chemotherapy, and a combination of the two modalities. Evidence is presented to show that:

(1) There is a direct relationship between the amount of radiation delivered and tolerated and the response of the tumor itself. Radiation is best understood in terms of the Strandqvist curve relationships. A Strandqvist ratio is defined as that percentile level towards the ideal curve that has been attained for a specific patient.

(2) Combination of 5-fluorouracil and ionizing radiation produces the same response as radiation alone, provided the radiation is given in a sufficient amount. If not, the drug can act as a useful additive.

(3) The amount of radiation delivered is significantly less in those patients where drugs are employed in combination. The end results, however, demonstrate that addition of the drug to a lowered radiation dosage does not jeopardize the chance of the patient gaining a good result. Indications for combined therapy include patients where the field size is such that ideal Strandqvist values are difficult to achieve or in those patients where there is known disease outside the field of radiation.

(4) Responses have been measured in both subjective and objective categories; the majority of patients who feel better, do, in fact, show objective changes in tumor growth patterns. Anticancer treatments rarely make a patient feel better in a nonspecific manner.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. P. Ryan, C. C. Compton, and R. J. Mayer
Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
N. Engl. J. Med., March 16, 2000; 342(11): 792 - 800.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.