AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Talner, L.
Right arrow Articles by Emarine, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Talner, L.
Right arrow Articles by Emarine, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 130, Issue 2, 257-260
Copyright © 1978 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Furosemide-augmented intravenous urography: results in essential hypertension

LB Talner, RA Stone, MN Coel, SB Levy, and CW Emarine

Giving an intravenous diuretic during urography (furosemide-augmented urography, vasodilated urography) causes renal swelling which is easily measured. Several investigators have used this observation as the basis of a screening test for renovascular hypertension. They found that normal kidneys enlarge in area by more than 10%, while kidneys with renal artery stenosis show a blunted size response, usually less than 5%. We used the technique in 46 patients with proven essential hypertension in order to further examine its potential usefulness in the hypertensive population. The 92 kidneys showed an average area increase of only 7.0% +/- 3.6% SD, and only 15% of the kidneys enlarged by more than 10%. Based on these observations we doubt that vasodilated urography will be valuable as a screening test for renovascular hypertension because of the high incidence of false positive and indeterminate results in patients without renal artery stenosis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. Kim, D. H. Porter, R. Brown, M. S. Crivello, P. Silva, and B. W.A. Leeming
Renal Artery Imaging: A Prospective Comparison of Intra-Arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography with Conventional Angiography
Angiology, May 1, 1991; 42(5): 345 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.