AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milgram, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milgram, J.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 130, Issue 4, 651-658
Copyright © 1978 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Osteochondral fractures: mechanisms of injury and fate of fragments

JW Milgram, LF Rogers, and JW Miller

Osteochondral fractures, although relatively common, are frequently misdiagnosed by both clinicians and radiologists. In many of these cases positive radiographic findings are present although subtle. This paper reviews the mechanisms of injury by which osteochondral fractures occur and discusses the radiographic features of such fractures. An analysis of 43 surgical cases of osteochondral fractures in different sites was undertaken with respect to the radiographic, surgical, and histopathologic findings. Fragments consisting of cartilage alone or cartilage and bone were analyzed in terms of their radiographic features acutely and chronically after the trauma. The pathologic changes occurring within the original fragments are differentiated from those of surface growth in the older loose bodies. Attached fragments react differently than loose fragments. Typical cases from the knee joint are illustrated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Teh
Imaging of the elbow
Imaging, September 1, 2007; 19(3): 220 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J Teh, V Sukumar, and S Jackson
Imaging of the elbow
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 193 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. A. Rubin, C. D. Harner, and J. M. Costello
Treatable Chondral Injuries in the Knee: Frequency of Associated Focal Subchondral Edema
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1099 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.