AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosink, B.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gosink, B.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 133, Issue 1, 19-23
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of hepatocellular disease

BB Gosink, SK Lemon, W Scheible, and GR Leopold

Retrospective evaluations were made of abdominal echograms in 61 patients who underwent liver biopsy within 3 weeks after ultrasound study. Without knowledge of clinical or biopsy data, determinations were made by two independent observers of: (1) liver size, (2) beam penetration, (3) echogenicity, (4) vascularity, (5) ancillary abnormality, and (6) diagnostic impression. Using these parameters, the presence of generalized parenchymal disease was identified in 81% of reviews of patients with cirrhosis. Thus, in patients with known cirrhosis, there was a 19% false negative rate. In normal patients, 76% were correctly called normal by the reviewers. However, in 24% generalized parenchymal disease was suggested (24% false positive). Patients with fatty liver could not be reliably distinguished from patients with cirrhosis, nor could patients with hepatitis be easily separated from those with normal livers. In all of these determinations, the combination of several features provided more diagnostic accuracy than any single echographic finding.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
A K P Lim, S D Taylor-Robinson, N Patel, R J Eckersley, R D Goldin, G Hamilton, G R Foster, H C Thomas, D O Cosgrove, and M J K Blomley
Hepatic vein transit times using a microbubble agent can predict disease severity non-invasively in patients with hepatitis C
Gut, January 1, 2005; 54(1): 128 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
M J K Blomley, A K P Lim, C J Harvey, N Patel, R J Eckersley, R Basilico, R Heckemann, A Urbank, D O Cosgrove, and S D Taylor-Robinson
Liver microbubble transit time compared with histology and Child-Pugh score in diffuse liver disease: a cross sectional study
Gut, August 1, 2003; 52(8): 1188 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.