AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gisvold, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karsell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gisvold, J.
Right arrow Articles by Karsell, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 133, Issue 6, 1143-1149
Copyright © 1979 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Computed tomographic mammography (CTM)

JJ Gisvold, DF Reese, and PR Karsell

Breasts of 724 patients were studied by physical examination, mammography, and computed tomographic mammography (CTM) using a scanner designed for evaluation of the breast. Among cases in which CTM was not accompanied by use of contrast material, there were 60 malignant lesions, of which 10% were missed by mammography, 32% by CTM, and 8% by both. Among cases where CTM was supplemented by a 50 ml injection of 75% contrast material, there were 63 malignant lesions, of which 14% were missed by mammography, 16% by CTM, and 3% by both. Among cases where CTM was supplemented by a 300 ml infusion of 30% contrast material, there were 41 malignant lesions, of which 7% were missed by mammography and 5% by CTM, but none by both. Clinically, 22% of the malignant lesions in the infusion series were occult. There were 44 benign lesions in patients studied with the infusion technique. With mammography 68% were suspicious for malignancy, and with CTM, 56%.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. K. Lindfors, J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. Yang, A. L. C. Kwan, and D. F. Miller
Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 725 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang, S. Carkaci, L. Chen, C.-J. Lai, A. Sahin, G. J. Whitman, and C. C. Shaw
Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast CT: Feasibility Study with Surgical Mastectomy Specimens
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1312 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone, T. R. Nelson, K. K. Lindfors, and J. A. Seibert
Dedicated Breast CT: Radiation Dose and Image Quality Evaluation
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 657 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.