AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bettmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Skillman, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bettmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Skillman, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 134, Issue 6, 1169-1172
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Reduction of venous thrombosis complicating phlebography

MA Bettmann, EW Salzman, D Rosenthal, P Clagett, G Davies, R Nebesar, K Rabinov, J Ploetz, and J Skillman

Patients who underwent radiographic phlebography were studied to determine the frequency of postphlebographic venous thrombosis. In a group of 23 patients who had negative phlebograms performed with standard contrast agent (60% sodium methylglucamine diatrizoate), nine had positive 125I-fibrinogen leg scans. On repeat phlebography, three had confirmed deep vein thrombosis, six overall developed deep or superficial thrombosis, and three had positive scans without demonstrable thrombi. In a second group of 34 patients studied with the contrast material diluted to 45%, only three developed positive scans, one due to deep venous thrombosis and two to superficial thrombosis. There was also a reduction in the incidence of postphlebographic symptoms of pain, tenderness, and erythema, but no apparent sacrifice in diagnostic accuracy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. E. Weinmann and E. W. Salzman
Deep-Vein Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., December 15, 1994; 331(24): 1630 - 1641.
[Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
C. M. Montefusco-von Kleist, C. Bakal, S. Sprayregen, B. A. Rhodes, and F. J. Veith
Comparison of Duplex Ultrasonography and Ascending Contrast Venography in the Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, June 1, 1993; 27(5): 350 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C. M. Montefusco-von Kleist, C. Bakal, S. Sprayregen, B. A. Rhodes, and F. J. Veith
Comparison of Duplex Ultrasonography and Ascending Contrast Venography in the Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis
Angiology, March 1, 1993; 44(3): 169 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Caner, M. Ozmen, A. Dincer, O. Kapucu, and C. Bekdik
Detection of Deep Vein Thrombosis: Combined Flow and Blood Pool Radionuclide Venography vs Contrast Venography
Angiology, October 1, 1991; 42(10): 796 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.