AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabrisky, J
Right arrow Articles by Hieshima, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabrisky, J
Right arrow Articles by Hieshima, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 2, 295-300
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Mobile 240 kVp phototimed chest radiography

J Tabrisky, MW Herman, DJ Torrance, and GB Hieshima

Chest radiographs obtained with mobile equipment for 240 kVp phototimed technique and conventional technique were compared in 161 patients. Features of interest were visualization of air space, interstitium, mediastinum, pleura and vessels, tracheobronchial tree, catheters and tubes. The 240 kVp system demonstrated consistently good visualization of central air passages, hilar contours, and pulmonary detail. It was superior to the conventional portable in eliminating respiratory motion, defining lung infiltrates, and localizing the endotracheal tube relation to the carina. The 240 kVp system had noticeable deficiencies in depicting calcifications, bone detail, and fat planes. These deficiencies were not of clinical significance. Although the equipment was compact, easily maneuverable, and simple to operate, the cassette holder was somewhat heavy--a detrimental but manageable factor. Another shortcoming was poor visualization of homogeneously opacified catheters within the mediastinum, although catheters with a dense radiopaque stripe alleviated this problem.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.