AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ott, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 2, 327-330
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema: emphasis on polyp detection

DJ Ott, DW Gelfand, WC Wu, and RM Kerr

Colonoscopically verified lesions (230 in 178 patients) were reviewed and compared to results of double-contrast barium enema studies performed by radiologists specifically interested in gastrointestinal disease. Eighteen carcinomas and 22 cases of colitis found endoscopically were accurately identified radiographically. In 140 patients with 190 polyps, 16 lesions were missed radiologically, a false-negative error for polyps of 8.4%. All undetected polyps were distal to the splenic flexure with the majority located in the sigmoid colon. Thus, the double-contrast barium enema study was quite effective in finding colon polyps, particularly proximal to the splenic flexure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Sosna, T. Sella, O. Sy, P. T. Lavin, R. Eliahou, S. Fraifeld, and E. Libson
Critical Analysis of the Performance of Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Detecting Colorectal Polyps >= 6 mm in the Era of CT Colonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 374 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, I. Laufer, and H. Herlinger
Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms at Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
W. L. England, J. J. Halls, and V. B. Hunt
Strategies for Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. L. Brandeau and D. M. Eddy
The Workup of the Asymptomatic Patient with a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1987; 7(1): 32 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.