AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sickles, E.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 2, 349-352
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Intramammary scar tissue: a mimic of the mammographic appearance of carcinoma

EA Sickles and KA Herzog

Scar tissue within the breast parenchyma, when dense and located adjacent to fatty tissue, often appears as a poorly defined, spiculated mass on mammography. Intramammary scars may also appear as areas of architectural distortion or clustered microcalcification, sometimes associated with thickening or retraction of overlying skin. Because of the difficulty in differentiating such benign lesions from carcinoma, false-positive diagnoses of cancer occur. This article illustrates the radiographic spectrum of intramammary scars to familiarize the reader with this entity. Although several differential criteria have been described to help distinguish benign scarring from carcinoma, these features are not totally dependable, resulting in the need for biopsy in most cases and careful clinical and radiographic observation in others.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. L. Lamm and R. J. Jackman
Mammographic Abnormalities Caused by Percutaneous Stereotactic Biopsy of Histologically Benign Lesions Evident on Follow-Up Mammograms
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 753 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.