AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S
Right arrow Articles by Veith, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprayregen, S
Right arrow Articles by Veith, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 5, 945-950
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Popliteal artery branches: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

S Sprayregen, KW Sniderman, TA Sos, U Vieux, A Singer, and FJ Veith

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the branches of the popliteal artery was performed in six patients, two of whom also had femoropopliteal angioplasty. Dilatation was performed with catheters ranging from 5.5 to 7 French. None of the popliteal branch dilatations was performed with an inflated balloon. Excellent dilatation, as documented by angiography and Doppler ultrasound pressure recordings, was obtained in four cases and moderate and slight improvement in one case each. Two of the four patients with excellent results had prompt healing of toe amputations and are doing well at 19 and 22 months after angioplasty. In the other two patients with excellent results, below-knee amputation was necessary despite patency of the dilated segment in one. In the other patient with initially excellent results, reocclusion occurred 4 months after angioplasty. In the patients who had moderate and slight improvement on angiography and in distal pressures, no significant clinical course change occurred. No patient had clinical deterioration after angioplasty and no significant complications occurred.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
M. D. Colburn and W. S. Moore
Surgery or Endovascular Surgery for Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia: What Selection Criteria Should We Use?
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1995; 8(1): 31 - 55.
[PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Troop, G. J. Peterson, and T. Pilla
Treatment of Advanced Vascular Disease with Intra-Arterial Thrombolytic Therapy Followed by Arterial Dilatation
Angiology, August 1, 1983; 34(8): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.