AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 135, Issue 6, 1167-1177
Copyright © 1980 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Sonography of the adrenal glands: normal glands and small masses

HC Yeh

To evaluate sonographic imaging of the normal adrenal glands, anterior transverse and longitudinal scans were made on 200 patients who had no evidence of adrenal disease. In 78 additional patients who were suspected of having adrenal masses, anterior and posterior transverse and longitudinal scanning and longitudinal oblique scanning were done. Anterior transverse scanning proved to be the best single method of scanning the adrenal gland and small adrenal masses. The normal adrenal gland which is 3-6 mm thick and adrenal masses as small as 1.3 cm can be delineated. Although the frequency of visualizing normal adrenal glands (78.5% on the right and 44% on the left) with sonography is not as high as with CT, masses are more readily detected than the normal glands. The accuracy for detecting adrenal masses is very high, with a false-negative rate of only 3%. Sonography can be a useful screening test for many patients who are suspected of having adrenal masses. However, for obese patients the image is degraded and a higher false-positive rate (3.5%) is obtained. CT provides better resolution for such patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
R. Z. Slapa, A. A. Kasperlik-Zaluska, J. A. Polanski, K. Borowicz, M. Serafin-Krol, and W. Jakubowski
Three-Dimensional Sonography in Diagnosis of Retroperitoneal Hemorrhage From Adrenocortical Carcinoma
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2004; 23(10): 1369 - 1373.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. Mansmann, J. Lau, E. Balk, M. Rothberg, Y. Miyachi, and S. R. Bornstein
The Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass: Update in Diagnosis and Management
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 309 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Mantero, M. Terzolo, G. Arnaldi, G. Osella, A. M. Masini, A. Alì, M. Giovagnetti, G. Opocher, and A. Angeli
A Survey on Adrenal Incidentaloma in Italy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2000; 85(2): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. Neumann, D. P. Berger, G. Sigmund, U. Blum, D. Schmidt, R. J. Parmer, B. Volk, and G. Kirste
Pheochromocytomas, Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2, and von Hippel-Lindau Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., November 18, 1993; 329(21): 1531 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. M. Pardo
Virilization of a Female Infant due to an Adrenal Tumor
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 1986; 25(9): 456 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.