AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N.
Right arrow Articles by Javadpour, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunnick, N.
Right arrow Articles by Javadpour, N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 6, 1093-1099
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Value of CT and lymphography: distinguishing retroperitoneal metastases from nonseminomatous testicular tumors

NR Dunnick and N Javadpour

Sixty-three consecutive patients with nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma were prospectively examined for paraaortic metastases before undergoing a staging laparotomy with lymphadenectomies or biopsies. Fifty patients had computed tomographic examinations and paraaortic metastases were correctly predicted in 25 of the 38 patients (sensitivity 66%) with paraaortic tumor. In the 56 patients having the study, lymphography was more accurate as 34 of the 44 patients with metastases (sensitivity 77%) were identified. Using inferior vena cavography in 55 patients, only 24 of 41 patients with metastatic tumor (sensitivity 59%) were diagnoses. All three methods had specificities of 100% in those patients who were free of paraaortic metastases. Overall accuracies were 74% for computed tomography, 82% for lymphography, and 69% for inferior vena cava cavography. Although lymphography was the most accurate method for nonbulky tumor, computed tomography was most useful for defining the extent of bulk disease. Inferior vena cavography did not contribute any new information and was responsible for one false-positive result which was explained by computed tomography. A combination of lymphography followed by computed tomography provided the most accurate assessment of paraaortic metastases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Guermazi, P. Brice, C. Hennequin, and E. Sarfati
Lymphography: An Old Technique Retains Its Usefulness
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1541 - 1558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.