AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendee, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 136, Issue 6, 1199-1205
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

X-ray equipment performance: a 3.5 year case history

RP Rossi, JM Niemkeiwicz, JA Mulvaney, and WR Hendee

The continuing performance of radiographic imaging systems has become increasingly important as the complexity and cost of these systems continue to escalate, as replacement funding becomes more difficult to obtain, and as advisory and regulatory agencies place increasing emphasis on equipment-oriented quality control procedures. As a guide to the continuing performance of these imaging systems, selected performance indicators for two general-purpose radiographic-fluoroscopic units have been monitored for a 3.5 year period. The observations suggest that with inspection and adjustment at 6 month intervals for generator, x-ray tube, and beam restriction systems, and at 2 month intervals for the intensified fluoroscopic imaging system, the overall performance of the imaging systems can be maintained at a high level of consistency equivalent to the performance achieved when the equipment was initially installed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.