AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgener, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hamlin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgener, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hamlin, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 137, Issue 2, 351-358
Copyright © 1981 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs. infusion

FA Burgener and DJ Hamlin

The accuracy of in vivo iodine estimations by CT in the aortic blood was determined in the dog. Iodine wash-out curves of five patients each receiving either a bolus of 100 ml diatrizoate 60% or a 10 min infusion of 300 ml diatrizoate 30% and 138 nonenhanced abdominal CT scans with various lesions in 104 patients were analyzed. This investigation suggests: (1) In vivo estimations of iodine concentrations are subject to considerable variation. (2) Iodine accumulation and wash-out for a given contrast administration mode are similar in liver, spleen, and pancreas with tissue iodine concentrations always below blood iodine concentrations, while a significant iodine concentration above iodine blood levels is found in the renal parenchyma. (3) If contrast enhancement is analyzed separately for bolus effect (arteriovenous iodine difference [AVID] greater than 30 H), nonequilibrium phase (AVID 10-30 H) and equilibrium phase (AVID less than 10 H), a good correlation between aortic blood and tissue iodine concentration is found for the latter two phases in the kidney, liver, and spleen which is independent of the contrast administration mode. (4) Visualization of all focal (cystic and solid) lesions is improved in the kidneys after contrast enhancement, while in the other investigated abdominal organs only cystic lesions are always better visualized on the enhanced scan regardless of contrast material dose, administration mode, and time of scanning. (5) Improved visualization of a solid lesion in liver, spleen, and pancreas is most likely achieved by scanning during bolus effect and the nonequilibrium phase, that is, within the first 2 min after a contrast material bolus or during a contrast material infusion. The chance to conceal a lesion in these organs increases significantly when performed at a later stage after contrast administration, that is, in the equilibrium phase.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kuszyk, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, C. A. Magee, and E. K. Fishman
Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors: Effect of Lesion Enhancement on Conspicuity in Rabbits
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 471 - 0.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.