AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by vanSonnenberg, E
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by vanSonnenberg, E
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 3, 577-580
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastroenterostomy: 1. Techniques derived from laboratory evaluation

E vanSonnenberg, GR Wittich, LK Brown, LB Tanenbaum, JB Campbell, DA Cubberley, and JF Gibbs

Various techniques, guidance systems, instruments, and the postmortem effects of percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) and percutaneous gastroenterostomy (PGE) were evaluated in 30 laboratory animals and five human cadavers. Methods to distend the stomach included air, fluid, intragastric balloon, and percutaneous needle inflation; a variety of trocar systems and catheters inserted by Seldinger technique (including those adapted from other uses and several designed specifically) were assessed. Fluoroscopy was the preferred guidance system, though sonography proved valuable (liver position, depth calculation to the stomach, localization of vessels to avoid), and the entire PG procedure was performed under sonographic guidance in four animals. Although the procedure was safe in most cases, several major complications did occur: laceration of a low-lying liver with exsanguination, malpositioned catheters in the lesser sac and adjacent to the spleen, and violation of the backwall of the stomach with laceration of celiac and splenic vessels. The animals and cadavers underwent autopsy. Autopsy revealed that firm gastrocutaneous tracts were formed by 7 days. There were few instances of wound infection, intraperitoneal fluid leakage, or evidence of trauma to the stomach when the catheters were well seated. Injury to the inferior epigastric artery is a potential hazard, and in cadaver dissections was located between the middle third and outer margin of the rectus abdominis muscle. Laboratory experience has been, and continues to be, an important means to improve and use new techniques for PG and PGE.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.