AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belt, T.
Right arrow Articles by Weetman, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 5, 955-961
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MRI of Wilms' tumor: promise as the primary imaging method

TG Belt, MD Cohen, JA Smith, DA Cory, S McKenna, and R Weetman

The magnetic resonance appearance of Wilms' tumor in 14 patients is described and its clinical utility is evaluated. In all cases, magnetic resonance was correlated with surgical and pathologic findings to assess accuracy. Magnetic resonance accurately identified the primary tumor and its renal origin in all cases, and tumor margins and local extension were accurately demonstrated. Tumor margins were smooth and well defined in nine of 12 cases. Local extension and size were accurately assessed, but because capsular invasion could not be predicted, four surgically proven instances of capsular invasion were missed. Metastatic spread into the liver and inferior vena cava was well documented in four cases and excluded in 10. Magnetic resonance was sensitive for identifying lymph-node enlargement in five of 14 cases, but could not predict the etiology of the enlargement. All Wilms' tumors had signal intensities consistent with prolonged T1 and T2 relaxation times. Signal intensity was highly variable, mainly because of necrosis and hemorrhage within the tumor. Magnetic resonance based on signal intensity could not distinguish Wilms' tumor from other solid renal tumors. Magnetic resonance has the potential for providing the same information as computed tomography, sonography, liver spleen radionuclide scanning, and excretory urography. Although expensive, magnetic resonance will be cost-effective if it can replace all the above techniques. This limited study indicates that magnetic resonance has promise as the primary imaging technique for Wilms' tumors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.