AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillman, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 146, Issue 5, 963-969
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The diffusion of MRI: patterns of siting and ownership in an era of changing incentives

AL Hillman and JS Schwartz

The rate and pattern of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) siting and ownership are examined in the context of the current turbulent health-care environment. By the end of 1984, 151 MRI units were located at 134 different sites. There was one MRI unit for every 1.55 million Americans. Most of the largest metropolitan areas had at least one unit. Overall, however, the diffusion rate of MRI has lagged behind that of computed tomography (CT). Trends in magnet preference, siting, and ownership are evolving. While the majority of all units are located within hospitals, the diffusion of nonhospital-based MRI units is accelerating. The deployment of hospital-based units is progressing at a slower rate, largely limited to academic institutions and urban centers. Purchase of superconducting and permanent magnets is accelerating, while that of resistive units is decreasing. Likewise, there is a trend toward adoption of intermediate (0.5 T-0.6 T) and large (1.0 T or 1.5 T) magnets. Ownership arrangements are highly varied and characterized by increased efforts at risk-sharing, trends that reflect a more competitive, profit-oriented medical-care environment. An analysis of recent health-policy initiatives and evolving market factors helps to explain some of these observations. Increased cost-consciousness, prospective reimbursement systems, loopholes in current regulations, and increased competition among health-care providers are influencing the diffusion of MRI and may herald the fate of other expensive medical technologies in the near future.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. J. Lanska and P. M. Peterson
Comparison of Additive and Multiplicative Models of Regional Variation in the Decline of Stroke Mortality in the United States
Stroke, June 1, 1996; 27(6): 1055 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.