|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Current recommendations for the plain radiographic evaluation of abdominal pain suggest a minimum three-film series including an erect and supine abdominal view and an erect chest study. Three film radiographic abdominal "series" were obtained in 252 consecutive emergency-room patients who presented with abdominal pain. The views were analyzed independently for their relative diagnostic value. Radiologic pathologic findings were present in 20% of the abdominal films and in 13% of the chest radiographs. The supine abdominal view and the erect chest study diagnosed normality or abnormality in 98% of these patients. The elimination of the erect abdominal view from the routine abdominal series could result in financial savings, decreased radiation exposure, and a more efficient use of technician time, without significant loss of diagnostic information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. M. Thompson, R. K. Kilani, B. B. Smith, J. Thomas, T. A. Jaffe, D. M. Delong, and E. K. Paulson Accuracy of Abdominal Radiography in Acute Small-Bowel Obstruction: Does Reviewer Experience Matter? Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W233 - W238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Lappas, B. L. Reyes, and D. D. T. Maglinte Abdominal Radiography Findings in Small-Bowel Obstruction: Relevance to Triage for Additional Diagnostic Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2001; 176(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |