AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atlas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atlas, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 3, 575-582
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The radiographic characterization of burst fractures of the spine

SW Atlas, V Regenbogen, LF Rogers, and KS Kim

A retrospective review of 75 burst fractures of the spine was performed to define the radiographic features found on high-resolution CT, polytomography, and plain radiography and thereby allow full characterization of this uncommon spinal injury. Characteristic components of the injury include: centripetally oriented disruption of the vertebral body, unilateral or bilateral laminar fractures that abut the spinous process, marked anterior wedging, vertically oriented vertebral fracture emanating from the basivertebral foramen, increased interpediculate distance, and significant spinal canal narrowing by characteristic retropulsed fragments. Nearly all bursts occurred from T9 to L5; double bursts were present in less than 10% of cases. The usually present neurologic deficit nearly always corresponded to the level of the burst rather than to the frequently found noncontiguous associated spine fracture. Recent literature suggests that these complex fractures, which were initially thought to represent stable injuries, are often unstable. A subcategorization of burst fractures and their variants is proposed to explain this instability. An approach to the radiographic diagnosis of the spinal burst is proposed, and plain film clues to distinguish the burst fracture from the more common compression fracture are discussed. Representative cases are illustrated.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. Lee, T. B. Hunter, and M. Taljanovic
Musculoskeletal Colloquialisms: How Did We Come Up with These Names?
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2004; 24(4): 1009 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Wintermark, E. Mouhsine, N. Theumann, P. Mordasini, G. van Melle, P. F. Leyvraz, and P. Schnyder
Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures in Patients Who Have Sustained Severe Trauma: Depiction with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 681 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Wood, G. Buttermann, A. Mehbod, T. Garvey, R. Jhanjee, and V. Sechriest
Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurological Deficit: A Prospective, Randomized Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2003; 85(5): 773 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.