AJR AJR Integrative Imaging Dec 2008 articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirvis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Whitley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirvis, S.
Right arrow Articles by Whitley, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 147, Issue 6, 1171-1175
Copyright © 1986 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis: a comparison of sonography, scintigraphy, and CT

SE Mirvis, Vainright JR, AW Nelson, GS Johnston, R Shorr, A Rodriguez, and NO Whitley

The clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acute acalculous cholecystitis is difficult, and the reliability of various diagnostic imaging techniques has not been established. The results of several imaging procedures performed over a 6-year period on 56 patients with clinically suspected acute acalculous cholecystitis were evaluated retrospectively. Sonography and CT were both highly sensitive (92% and 100%, respectively) and specific (96% and 100%, respectively). Hepatobiliary scintigraphy was compromised by frequent false-positives; the result was a specificity of only 38%. Percutaneous bile aspiration was insufficiently sensitive (33%) for diagnosis. Sonography was as sensitive as hepatobiliary scintigraphy and was more specific in establishing the diagnosis. Because sonography is relatively inexpensive and can be performed at the bedside, it should be regarded as a satisfactory screening procedure. However, CT is a good alternative in an easily transported patient when other intraabdominal disease is suspected.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Altun, R. C. Semelka, J. Elias Jr, L. Braga, V. Voultsinos, J. Patel, N. C. Balci, and J. T. Woosley
Acute Cholecystitis: MR Findings and Differentiation from Chronic Cholecystitis
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 174 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Grand, K. M. Horton, and E. Fishman
CT of the Gallbladder: Spectrum of Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 163 - 170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
R Zissin, A Osadchy, M Shapiro-Feinberg, and G Gayer
CT of a thickened-wall gall bladder
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2003; 76(902): 137 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. L. Bennett, H. Rusinek, V. Lisi, G. M. Israel, G. A. Krinsky, C. M. Slywotzky, and A. Megibow
CT Findings in Acute Gangrenous Cholecystitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 275 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. M. Mutlu, E. A. Mutlu, and P. Factor
GI Complications in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, April 1, 2001; 119(4): 1222 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. T. Harvey and W. T. Miller Jr
Acute Biliary Disease: Initial CT and Follow-up US versus Initial US and Follow-up CT
Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 831 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.