AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, , JR
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 1, 39-43
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Mammographic detection of recurrent cancer in the irradiated breast

PC Stomper, A Recht, AL Berenberg, MS Jochelson, and Harris JR

Recurrence of cancer in the irradiated breast is an uncommon but potentially curable problem. Posttreatment mammograms were studied in 45 patients who had biopsies of an irradiated breast for suspected local recurrence to evaluate the usefulness of mammography in detecting such recurrences. Of 23 biopsy-proven recurrences, eight (35%) were detected by mammography only, nine (39%) were detected by physical examination only, and six (26%) were detected by both. Mammographic findings in recurrent malignancy included microcalcifications in six, microcalcifications associated with a mass in four, soft-tissue masses in three, and inflammatory changes in one. The results show that mammographic follow-up is complementary to physical examination in the detection of local recurrence in women who have undergone radiation therapy for early breast cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I. Gunhan-Bilgen and A. Oktay
Management of Microcalcifications Developing at the Lumpectomy Bed After Conservative Surgery and Radiation Therapy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 393 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Morakkabati, C. C. Leutner, A. Schmiedel, H. H. Schild, and C. K. Kuhl
Breast MR Imaging during or Soon after Radiation Therapy
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. Mintzer, J. Glassburn, B. A. Mason, and D. Sataloff
Breast Cancer in the Very Young Patient: A Multidisciplinary Case Presentation
Oncologist, December 1, 2002; 7(6): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Morrow, E. A. Strom, L. W. Bassett, D. D. Dershaw, B. Fowble, A. Giuliano, J. R. Harris, F. O'Malley, S. J. Schnitt, S. E. Singletary, et al.
Standard for Breast Conservation Therapy in the Management of Invasive Breast Carcinoma
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2002; 52(5): 277 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. E. Sohlich, E. A. Sickles, E. S. Burnside, and K. E. Dee
Interpreting Data from Audits When Screening and Diagnostic Mammography Outcomes Are Combined
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 681 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. E. Dee and E. A. Sickles
Medical Audit of Diagnostic Mammography Examinations: Comparison with Screening Outcomes Obtained Concurrently
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 729 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. S. Giess, D. M. Keating, M. P. Osborne, J. Mester, and R. Rosenblatt
Comparison of Rate of Development and Rate of Change for Benign and Malignant Breast Calcifications at the Lumpectomy Bed
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 789 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
L. K.F. Temple, E. E.L. Wang, and R. S. McLeod
Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 1999; 161(8): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. Krishnamurthy, G. J. Whitman, C. B. Stelling, and A. C. Kushwaha
Mammographic Findings after Breast Conservation Therapy
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 53 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. S. Giess, D. M. Keating, M. P. Osborne, and R. Rosenblatt
Local Tumor Recurrence following Breast-Conservation Therapy: Correlation of Histopathologic Findings with Detection Method and Mammographic Findings
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.