AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torres, W.
Right arrow Articles by Bernardino, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torres, W.
Right arrow Articles by Bernardino, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 6, 1109-1113
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

The correlation between MR and angiography in portal hypertension

WE Torres, GM Gaylord, L Whitmire, VP Chuang, and ME Bernardino

Forty-two MR examinations and hepatic panangiograms in 38 patients with portal hypertension were correlated with MR images to determine the ability of MR to detect portal vein hemodynamics. These studies were prospectively analyzed for degree of portal perfusion and direction of flow, portal vein thrombosis, and presence and type of shunt surgery. Thirty-three MR examinations were determined to have grade I (good) or II (fair) portal blood flow. Twenty-nine of these were grade I or II by angiography; the other four were grade IV. Of the eight cases documented as grade IV (hepatofugal portal blood flow) by angiography, none were considered grade IV by MR, suggesting that MR was unable to detect retrograde flow. The other case was not graded because of cavernous transformation of the portal vein. MR correlated well with angiography for the detection or absence of portal vein thrombus, agreeing with angiography in 41 of 42 cases. Two angiographically proven cases of portal vein thrombosis were correctly identified on MR. MR correctly identified the absence of portal vein clot in 39 of 40 angiographically negative cases. MR and angiography also agreed in 41 of 42 cases that a shunt was either present/absent or patent/occluded. The single error was due to inadequate MR scanning in the region of interest. The results show that MR cannot be used to grade blood flow in the portal vein. However, MR accurately detects portal vein thrombosis and the patency of surgical shunts.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.