AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gylys-Morin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gylys-Morin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Resnick, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 148, Issue 6, 1153-1157
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Articular cartilage defects: detectability in cadaver knees with MR

VM Gylys-Morin, PC Hajek, DJ Sartoris, and D Resnick

The capability of 1.5-T MR imaging to detect focal defects in articular cartilage was investigated with cadaveric knees with and without intraarticular injection of saline and gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA). Full-thickness cartilage lesions ranging in diameter from 1 to 5 mm were surgically created in the femoral articular surfaces. Images were acquired with a variety of pulse techniques, slice thicknesses, and interslice gaps as well as one or two signal excitations. Potential intraarticular contrast agents (saline and Gd-DTPA) were tested, and their signal behaviors compared with that of hyaline cartilage. All cartilage defects were occult on T1-weighted and balanced images without Gd-DTPA. The smallest defect identified by using intraarticular saline was 3 mm in diameter and was apparent only on T2-weighted images. Intraarticular Gd-DTPA afforded detection of defects as small as 2 mm, even with short imaging times. Signal-intensity differences between saline and articular cartilage were minimal on T1-weighted images and increased on T2-weighted images; intensity differences were high between Gd-DTPA and articular cartilage on all imaging sequences. These results indicate that intraarticular fluid and appropriate selection of imaging sequences are necessary for delineation of focal defects in articular cartilage. They also show that Gd-DTPA is the optimal contrast agent for this purpose.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Brittberg, A. Lindahl, A. Nilsson, C. Ohlsson, O. Isaksson, and L. Peterson
Treatment of Deep Cartilage Defects in the Knee with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation
N. Engl. J. Med., October 6, 1994; 331(14): 889 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. P. Speer, C. E. Spritzer, J. L. Goldner, and W. E. Garrett JR
Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic knee articular cartilage injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1991; 19(4): 396 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.