AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Richie, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Richie, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 149, Issue 6, 1187-1190
Copyright © 1987 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Detection of retroperitoneal metastases in early-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer: analysis of different CT criteria

PC Stomper, CY Fung, MA Socinski, MS Jochelson, MB Garnick, and JP Richie

Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115.

To determine the predictive values of using different sizes on CT as criteria for the detection of retroperitoneal lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage (nodes 5 cm or less in diameter) primary nonseminomatous testicular cancer, we performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients. Measurements of lymph-node transaxial diameters on CT were correlated with histologic findings at lymph-node dissection or with response to initial chemotherapy. All patients had normal serum markers (alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin) after orchiectomy. The frequency of lymph-node metastases in this population was 51%. When a CT criterion of 5 mm was used, the negative predictive value was 79%; the positive predictive value, 62%; the specificity, 44%; and the sensitivity, 88%. With a criterion of 15 mm, the negative predictive value was 63%; the positive predictive value, 71%; the specificity, 76%; and the sensitivity, 58%. Metastases in retroperitoneal lymph nodes that appeared within normal limits (i.e., had normal transaxial diameters) on CT were the limiting factor in the ability of CT to exclude the presence of metastases. We conclude that using smaller sizes on CT scans as the criteria for detection of lymph-node metastases cannot replace dissection of nodes in patients who have normal-sized nodes but may be helpful in identifying a subgroup of patients who are at lower risk of harboring metastases when treatment by orchiectomy alone is considered.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.