AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unger, E
Right arrow Articles by Broder, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unger, E
Right arrow Articles by Broder, G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 3, 605-610
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis by MR imaging

E Unger, P Moldofsky, R Gatenby, W Hartz, and G Broder

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111.

Bone scans are highly sensitive for the diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis, but the difficulty of separating bone-marrow processes from soft-tissue disease limits the specificity and accuracy. A diagnostic technique capable of distinguishing bone-marrow processes from soft-tissue disease would improve the diagnostic accuracy of osteomyelitis. To evaluate the use of MR in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis, MR examinations were performed in 35 patients with suspected acute osteomyelitis. Twelve of these were proved to have osteomyelitis either by surgery (nine patients) or by clinical follow-up (three patients). In the other 23, osteomyelitis was excluded by surgery (12 patients) or by the clinical course (11 patients). Evidence of osteomyelitis on MR consisted of abnormalities of the bone marrow with decreased signal intensity on the T1-weighted images and increased signal intensity on the T2-weighted or short-T1 inversion recovery (STIR) images. MR and bone scintigraphy were interpreted by two radiologists who were given no clinical information other than to rule out osteomyelitis. The sensitivities of MR and static bone scan were 100% for bone-marrow abnormality. Because bone-marrow abnormality in osteomyelitis associated with healing fractures was incorrectly diagnosed by MR (one case) and bone scintigraphy (two cases), the sensitivities of MR and scintigraphy for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis were 92% and 82%, respectively. The specificities of MR and scintigraphy were 96% and 65%, respectively (p less than .05). The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis was 94% for MR and 71% for bone scan (p less than .05). Because of its ability to separate soft-tissue disease from underlying bone marrow, MR may be used to evaluate patients with positive bone scintigraphy to improve the specificity and accuracy of diagnosis for osteomyelitis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.Y. Hsu, C.W. Yu, M.Z. Wu, B.B. Chen, K.M. Huang, and T.T.F. Shih
Unusual Manifestations of Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Intraosseous Lesions Mimicking Metastases
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P L Tan and J Teh
MRI of the diabetic foot: differentiation of infection from neuropathic change
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 939 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. L. Dunfee, O. Sakai, R. Pistey, and A. Gohel
Radiologic and Pathologic Characteristics of Benign and Malignant Lesions of the Mandible
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1751 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. S. Collins, M. M. Schaar, D. E. Wenger, and J. N. Mandrekar
T1-Weighted MRI Characteristics of Pedal Osteomyelitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 386 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. B. Smith, A. G. Kane, A. H. Sholes, and J. H. Freeman
Resolution of an Aggressive Ideopathic Diskitis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1008 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. Lazzarini, J. T. Mader, and J. H. Calhoun
Osteomyelitis in Long Bones
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2305 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. McCarthy, J. P. Dormans, S. H. Kozin, and P. D. Pizzutillo
Musculoskeletal Infections in Children. Basic Treatment Principles and Recent Advancements
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 850 - 863.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Schiesser, K. D. M. Stumpe, O. Trentz, T. Kossmann, and G. K. von Schulthess
Detection of Metallic Implant-associated Infections with FDG PET in Patients with Trauma: Correlation with Microbiologic Results
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 391 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Lieberman, D. J. Berry, M. A. Montv, R. K. Aaron, J. J. Callaghan, A. Rayadhyaksha, and J. R. Urbaniak
Osteonecrosis of the Hip: Management in the Twenty-first Century
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2002; 84(5): 834 - 853.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. L. Skaggs, S. K. Kim, N. W. Greene, D. Harris, and J. H. Miller
Differentiation Between Bone Infarction and Acute Osteomyelitis in Children with Sickle-Cell Disease with Use of Sequential Radionuclide Bone-Marrow and Bone Scans
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2001; 83(12): 1810 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Theodorou, S. J. Theodorou, Y. Kakitsubata, D. J. Sartoris, and D. Resnick
Imaging Characteristics and Epidemiologic Features of Atypical Mycobacterial Infections Involving the Musculoskeletal System
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 341 - 349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Iida, Y. Harada, K. Shimizu, M. Sakamoto, S. Ikenoue, T. Akita, H. Kitahara, and H. Moriya
Correlation Between Bone Marrow Edema and Collapse of the Femoral Head in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. K. Lee, K. J. Suh, Y. W. Kim, H. K. Ryeom, Y. S. Kim, J. M. Lee, Y. Chang, Y. J. Kim, and D. S. Kang
Septic Arthritis versus Transient Synovitis at MR Imaging: Preliminary Assessment with Signal Intensity Alterations in Bone Marrow
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 459 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
B. J. Bloom, L. C. Miller, L. B. Tucker, and J. G. Schaller
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Staphylococcal Osteomyelitis With Negative Bone Scan
Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 1994; 33(11): 686 - 687.
[PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. R Edelman and S. Warach
Magnetic Resonance Imaging- First of Two Parts
N. Engl. J. Med., March 11, 1993; 328(10): 708 - 716.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.