AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dershaw, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dershaw, D.
Right arrow Articles by Scher, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 150, Issue 5, 1055-1059
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

Serial transabdominal sonography of bladder cancer

DD Dershaw and HI Scher

Department of Medical Imaging, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

In 23 patients with known transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, 58 serial transabdominal sonograms were obtained, providing 35 cases in which interval change could be evaluated by sonography. Results were correlated with cystoscopy or surgery. Sonography accurately gauged change in 29 instances (83%), of which 13 showed increase, four decrease, and 12 stability of tumor. Errors in assessing interval change occurred when surgery between sonograms caused secondary bladder deformity or patchy edema of the bladder wall; these were misinterpreted as tumor growth. When smooth bladder thickening was present, sonography could not differentiate flat tumor from edema. In no case in which the bladder wall was normal on sonography was tumor found. In four cases sonography was a more accurate indicator of depth of tumor than cystoscopy was. These results suggest that sonography is a useful adjunct to cystoscopy and may be a dependable means of decreasing the frequency of invasive procedures to evaluate the extent of bladder disease. The use of these two techniques together may improve the accuracy achieved by using cystoscopy alone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
T B Hall and A D MacVicar
Imaging of bladder cancer
Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(1): 1 - 10.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.