AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krol, G
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krol, G
Right arrow Articles by Walker, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 151, Issue 3, 583-588
Copyright © 1988 by American Roentgen Ray Society


Articles

MR of cranial and spinal meningeal carcinomatosis: comparison with CT and myelography

G Krol, G Sze, M Malkin, and R Walker

Department of Medical Imaging and Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

Thirty-nine patients with histologically proved primary neoplasms, focal neurologic deficits, and positive CSF cytology were evaluated by enhanced cranial CT and MR, or complete myelography and MR of the spine. Intracranial abnormalities were noted on CT in 56% of cases and included abnormal enhancement of subarachnoid space and ventricular walls, ventricular dilatation, obliteration of cortical sulci, and enhancing nodules within the subarachnoid cisterns and lumen of the lateral ventricles. Although the degree of ventricular enlargement and intraventricular tumor deposits were equally well seen on CT and MR, involvement of ventricular walls, tentorium, subarachnoid cisterns, or subarachnoid space interpreted as abnormal enhancement on CT was not readily appreciated on routine T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences. Forty-four percent of CT and 65% of MR studies were interpreted as normal. There was high correlation of myelographic findings with clinical diagnosis, and no false-negative myelograms. Nodular filling defects within the subarachnoid space, thickening and crowding of roots of the cauda equina, irregularity of individual roots, and scalloping of the subarachnoid membranes were demonstrated. MR was rather insensitive in detecting these changes, revealing a definite abnormality of the subarachnoid space in 27% of patients with positive myelograms. False-negative interpretation of MR of the spine was made in 44% of cases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.J. Seidenwurm and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
Myelopathy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1032 - 1034.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.