American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 157, 235-239, Copyright © 1991 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evolution, early results, and impact on nonsurgical gallstone therapies

JC Brandon, MA Velez, SK Teplick, PR Mueller, DW Rattner, JR Broadwater Jr, NP Lang and JF Eidt
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Orange 92668.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a surgical technique first performed in France, has gained widespread acceptance among surgeons in the United States. The abdominal cavity is inflated by carbon dioxide, a video monitor is inserted via a laparoscope placed periumbilically, and the gallbladder is freed and removed from the liver bed by using small subcostal ports for access and dissection. Intraoperative cholangiography is routinely performed, but uncertainty exists about how best to manage choledocholithiasis. Compared with traditional cholecystectomy, initial reports describing laparoscopic cholecystectomy cite shorter recovery times because no large incisions are made, thus potentially reducing the cost and morbidity of cholecystectomy. A survey of 614 early cases supports these claims, with a reported complication rate of 1.5% and quick resumption of normal activities by patients. Because of its promise for reduced morbidity, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is challenging open cholecystectomy as the therapeutic gold standard for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Thus, the standard to which the nonsurgical gallstone therapies, such as lithotripsy and contact dissolution, will be compared may shift to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. As the laparoscopic complications are similar to those of traditional cholecystectomy, such as abscesses and bile leaks, their percutaneous treatment should not change.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?