AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moulton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moulton, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, K. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 1191-1199, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions

JS Moulton, JS Blebea, DM Dunco, SE Braley, GS Bisset 3rd and KH Emery
Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, OH 45267-0742, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MR imaging in predicting the pathologic diagnosis of soft-tissue masses, both neoplastic and nonneoplastic, and in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The imaging features of 225 soft-tissue tumors (179 benign, 46 malignant) in 222 patients were analyzed. Univariate analysis of multiple individual imaging features was done, along with stepwise logistic regression analysis of combinations of imaging features, to determine how useful these are for predicting malignancy or benignity. A subjective (group consensus) analysis of each case was done prospectively, and each tumor was placed into one of three diagnostic categories: (1) benign, diagnostic of a specific entity; (2) nonspecific, most likely benign; or (3) nonspecific, most likely malignant. Results were compared with the final diagnosis established by pathologic examination (n = 184) or imaging/clinical data (n = 41). RESULTS. By quantitative analysis, no single imaging feature or combination of features could reliably be used to distinguish benign from malignant lesions. For the subjective analysis, a correct and specific benign diagnosis could be made on the basis of MR imaging findings in 100 (44%) of the 225 tumors. For the entire cohort, the sensitivity was 78%, the specificity was 89%, the positive predictive value was 65%, and the negative predictive value was 94% for a malignant diagnosis. When the diagnostic benign tumors were excluded, the specificity and negative predictive value decreased to 76% and 86%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity and positive predictive value remained the same. CONCLUSION. Many benign soft-tissue masses can be correctly and confidently diagnosed with MR imaging. The prevalence of benign lesions among soft-tissue masses accounts for the relatively high specificity and negative predictive value that can be achieved with MR imaging for tissue characterization. However, the accuracy of MR imaging declines when these characteristic benign tumors are excluded from analysis. A significant percentage of malignant lesions may appear deceptively "benign" with the currently used criteria. For lesions whose imaging appearance is nonspecific, MR imaging is not reliable for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors, and these lesions warrant biopsy in most cases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Robinson, R. R. Bleakney, P. C. Ferguson, and B. O'Sullivan
Oncodiagnosis Panel: 2007: Multidisciplinary Management of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2008; 28(7): 2069 - 2086.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Biswal, D. L. Resnick, J. M. Hoffman, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging: Integration of Molecular Imaging into the Musculoskeletal Imaging Practice
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 651 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-A. Choi, G.-K. Lee, K. Y. Kong, S. H. Hong, J. S. Suh, J. M. Ahn, Y. J. Lee, K. H. Cho, J. G. Park, J. Y. Choi, et al.
Imaging Findings of Kimura's Disease in the Soft Tissue of the Upper Extremity
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. S. P. van Rijswijk, M. J. A. Geirnaerdt, P. C. W. Hogendoorn, A. H. M. Taminiau, F. van Coevorden, A. H. Zwinderman, T. L. Pope, and J. L. Bloem
Soft-Tissue Tumors: Value of Static and Dynamic Gadopentetate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Imaging in Prediction of Malignancy
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 493 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E.-L. H. J. Teo, P. J. Strouse, and R. J. Hernandez
MR Imaging Differentiation of Soft-Tissue Hemangiomas from Malignant Soft-Tissue Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1623 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. Amagasu, D. Lee, and C. D. Bluestone
Imaging Quiz Case 1
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 1999; 125(5): 592 - 594.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Chung, D. P. Frush, N. S. Prose, C. R. Shea, T. Laor, and G. S. Bisset
Subcutaneous Granuloma Annulare: MR Imaging Features in Six Children and Literature Review
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.