AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, W. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 1397-1401, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Diagnosis of venoocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: value of duplex sonography

SA Teefey, JA Brink, RA Borson and WD Middleton
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine if duplex sonography of the hepatic vasculature can be used to detect venoocclusive disease in patients who have had bone marrow transplantation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-seven bone marrow transplant recipients were serially studied with hepatic duplex sonography before (n = 27) and biweekly after (n = 136) transplantation. Duplex waveforms were obtained from the hepatic artery and the portal and hepatic venous systems. Clinical records were reviewed to confirm the clinical diagnosis of venoocclusive disease (n = 5), including its time of onset and duration. Patients with venoocclusive disease were further split into two groups: those with clinically active disease and those with clinically inactive disease. The resistive index in the hepatic artery, the velocity in the portal vein, and the differences among bone marrow transplant values before and after transplantation were compared among the groups. RESULTS. On the basis of data obtained before transplantation, a resistive index greater than 0.76 and a change in resistive index greater than 0.10 after transplantation were considered abnormal. Similarly, velocity in the portal vein after transplantation was considered abnormal when the value was less than 4.3 cm/sec or more than 50.3 cm/sec. There was no statistically significant difference in the resistive index in the hepatic artery or velocity in the portal vein among patient groups. Hepatopetal portal venous flow was shown in 26 of 27 patients during the study. Portal venous flow was reversed in one patient with venoocclusive disease. Appropriately directed hepatic venous flow was demonstrated in all 27 patients. CONCLUSION. Our study shows that resistive index in the hepatic artery, velocity and flow direction in the portal vein, and flow direction in the hepatic vein as detected by duplex sonography are of no value in the diagnosis of venoocclusive disease after transplantation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Ghersin, O. R. Brook, D. Gaitini, and A. Engel
Color Doppler Demonstration of Segmental Portal Flow Reversal: An Early Sign of Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease in an Infant
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1103 - 1106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S A Sohaib
Extrapulmonary complications of bone marrow transplantation
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.