AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Resch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Resch, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Resch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Resch, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 164, 1447-1450, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Risk of vertebral fractures in men: relationship to mineral density of the vertebral body

A Resch, B Schneider, P Bernecker, A Battmann, J Wergedal, R Willvonseder and H Resch
Department of Radiology, University, Vienna, Austria.

OBJECTIVE. Vertebral fracture is the most frequent manifestation of osteoporosis in women. Because there is a lack of information about bone density and the occurrence of fractures in men with osteoporosis, we evaluated the relationship between vertebral fractures and spinal bone mineral density (BMD) to determine if there is a threshold of BMD below which fractures are likely to occur. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Radiographs of the spine and BMD measurements of the lumbar spine as measured by quantitative CT were obtained in 201 men 21-86 years old (mean age, 68 +/- 4 years) who were referred consecutively for osteoporosis screening. Radiographs were interpreted for the presence or absence of vertebral fractures. The probability of fractures was determined after classifying the patients into subgroups according to their quantitative CT values. The relationship of spinal bone mass to spinal fracture was examined by both logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS. Seventy-one patients were classified as having definite vertebral compression fractures. Spinal BMD was 132 +/- 34 mg/ml for the 130 men without vertebral fractures and 75 +/- 22 mg/ml for the 71 men with vertebral fractures (p < .001). The number of fractures per patient and the BMD were negatively correlated (r = -0.71, p < 0.0001). When a BMD of 100 mg/ml was given as a fracture threshold, 15% of the patients without fractures were below this value and 14% of the patients with fractures were above this threshold. Quantifying the overlap between values from patients with and without fractures by ROC analysis, the value of 100 mg/ml gave a sensitivity of 86%. Logistic regression showed 105 mg/ml as the most discriminate value, resulting in a sensitivity of 90%. Logistic regression analysis of the predicted fracture probability also indicated that age does not significantly influence the regression curve. CONCLUSION. We found that direct quantitative CT measurement of the BMD of the vertebral body is a highly efficient approach to distinguish men without vertebral fractures from those with fractures. Thus, a fracture-threshold concept could provide a quantitative criterion to identify men at high risk for vertebral fractures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.