AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rockette, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rockette, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 165, 679-683, Copyright © 1995 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Imaging systems evaluation: effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of receiver operating characteristic studies

HE Rockette, JL King, JL Medina, HB Eisen, ML Brown and D Gur
Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

OBJECTIVE. Large-scale receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies are expensive and time-consuming. If most of the difference in diagnostic accuracy occurs in a subset of subtle cases, considerable effort could be saved by restricting comparisons to this subset. We investigate the effect of subtle cases on diagnostic accuracy, the magnitude of error that can occur because of an imbalance of subtle cases in two groups, and the potential for sample size reductions if only subtle cases are used. METHODS. Data from a previous study of posteroanterior chest radiographs were reanalyzed separately for subsets of typical cases and subsets of subtle cases. Actually positive and actually negative cases were classified as subtle or typical and as difficult or easy for diagnosis of the specific abnormality. The area under the ROC curve (Az) was used as the measure of diagnostic accuracy. Pairwise comparisons were done among three techniques and for the detection of nodules and interstitial disease. RESULTS. The performance index (Az) was significantly (> or = 25%) lower for the subset of subtle cases as compared with the subset of typical cases. The difference in observer performance between two techniques was more often greater in the subset of subtle cases than in the subset of typical cases. CONCLUSION. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the subset of typical cases and the subset of subtle cases is large enough that a difference in the proportion of subtle cases in two samples could result in clinically significant false differences in observer performance. Furthermore, the generally larger difference observed in the group of subtle cases suggests that sample sizes for some experiments could be reduced by 45-90% if the experiment were restricted to subtle cases.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
N. A Obuchowski
Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 1998; 7(4): 371 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.