AJR Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Lankeren, W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerritsen, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Lankeren, W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerritsen, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 166, 1355-1360, Copyright © 1996 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Intravascular sonographic evaluation of iliac artery angioplasty: what is the mechanism of angioplasty and can intravascular sonography predict clinical outcome?

W van Lankeren, EJ Gussenhoven, A van der Lugt, M Vischjager, P Khajehi, H Pieterman and PG Gerritsen
University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the arterial responses of the iliac artery after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), using intravascular sonography, and to correlate intravascular sonography parameters with clinical outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study included 21 patients studied with intravascular sonography before and after PTA of the iliac artery. Distinction was made between intravascular sonography cross sections collected from the common iliac and those from the external iliac artery. First, qualitative and quantitative intravascular sonography data obtained at the most stenotic site were compared with data derived from all corresponding cross sections of the dilated segment. Second, the predictive value of intravascular sonography parameters for the patient outcome was assessed. RESULTS: The free lumen and media-bounded areas seen in the common iliac artery were larger than those seen in the external iliac artery. Qualitative and quantitative effects of PTA observed with intravascular sonography on the two types of artery were not different. Vascular damage occurred in 81% of the patients. The frequency of vascular damage at the most stenotic site was slightly lower than in each dilated segment studied. The reduction in area stenosis after intervention was associated with an increase in the free lumen and media-bounded areas, whereas the plaque area reduced only slightly. The increase in the free lumen and media-bounded areas and the decrease in the plaque area at the most stenotic site after intervention were larger than the mean values. Qualitative data seen with intravascular sonography at the most stenotic site before and after intervention were not predictive of the patient outcome. In patients with an uneventful outcome after intervention, the free lumen area measured at the most stenotic site after PTA was larger and the area stenosis was smaller than in patients with a failure. CONCLUSION: This study of intravascular sonography established that although the common iliac artery is larger than the external iliac artery, the qualitative and quantitative effects of PTA in both types of artery were similar. The size of the free lumen area and the degree of stenosis seen with intravascular sonography after PTA at the most stenotic site may be predictive of a patient outcome.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.