AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 168, 1215-1221, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma

MJ Kim, JJ Chung, YH Lee, JT Lee and HS Yoo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of fast spin-echo MR imaging that uses a transrectal surface coil with the accuracy of fast spin-echo MR imaging that uses a pelvic phased-array coil for preoperative local staging of uterine cervical carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with pathologically confirmed invasive cervical carcinoma who underwent MR imaging using both a pelvic phased-array coil and a transrectal surface coil were retrospectively evaluated. Both sets of images were reviewed in random order by three observers who then reached a consensus opinion at a second session. Among the 28 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy, findings from MR imaging and pathologic staging were compared. In the remaining nonsurgical cases, findings from MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased- array coil were compared with findings from pelvic examinations under general anesthesia. RESULTS: MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil revealed 50 (88%) of the 57 tumors found at surgery, and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil revealed 44 (77%) of the 57 tumors, resulting in a statistically significant (p < .05) difference. In patients who underwent surgery (n = 28), the accuracy of the overall staging and the parametrial evaluation were not significantly different for MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil (89% and 96%, respectively, on MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil; 89% and 93%, respectively, on MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil). For the patients who did not undergo surgery (n = 34), MR imaging using a transrectal surface coil and MR imaging using a pelvic phased-array coil corresponded in 82% for overall staging and in 92% for parametrial invasion. CONCLUSION: The use of a transrectal surface coil improved detection of small tumors of the uterine cervix but did not significantly improve the accuracy of overall staging or the accuracy of assessment of parametrial invasion.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. M. Charles-Edwards, C. Messiou, V. A. Morgan, S. S. De Silva, N. A. McWhinney, M. Katesmark, A. D. Attygalle, and N. M. deSouza
Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Cervical Cancer with an Endovaginal Technique: Potential Value for Improving Tumor Detection in Stage Ia and Ib1 Disease
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 541 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.