AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Henkelman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Henkelman, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1089-1096, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage

JD Rubenstein, JG Li, S Majumdar and RM Henkelman
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the MR image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required to reveal morphologic abnormalities in degenerative cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro MR microscopy of healthy bovine and degenerative human patellar cartilage was performed and image resolution degraded to simulate resolution achievable in routine and optimized clinical MR images. Noise was then added to images as in-plane resolution was increased to simulate the MR imaging appearance of cartilage with improved resolution, which is possible using a standard magnetic field strength. MR images of patellar cartilage from a healthy volunteer were also obtained to determine optimal SNR and image resolution achievable at 1.5 T; these images were compared with in vitro images to determine those features of abnormal cartilage that can be identified using available clinical MR imaging techniques. RESULTS: In-plane resolution of 39 microns exquisitely defines degenerative changes in articular cartilage. As in-plane resolution decreases to 600 microns, only gross cartilage thinning and signal intensity alterations are seen. MR images simulating progressively improved resolution using higher field strength gradients with conventional field strengths and RF coils provided suboptimal information because of low SNR. CONCLUSION: Routine clinical MR images do not accurately reveal early degenerative changes in articular cartilage; only large defects and distorted changes in the signal intensity of cartilage are seen.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. G. Disler, Y. Y. Ho, A. J. Stanley, J. H.-P. Hui, and S.-C. Wang
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 221 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. T. Kelly, H. G. Potter, X.-H. Deng, A. D. Pearle, A. S. Turner, R. F. Warren, and S. A. Rodeo
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Sheep Knee: Evaluation of Chondroprotective Effects
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1464 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. N. Masi, C. A. Sell, C. Phan, E. Han, D. Newitt, L. Steinbach, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link
Cartilage MR Imaging at 3.0 versus That at 1.5 T: Preliminary Results in a Porcine Model
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 140 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Vasanawala, B. A. Hargreaves, J. M. Pauly, D. G. Nishimura, C. F. Beaulieu, and G. E. Gold
Rapid Musculoskeletal MRI with Phase-Sensitive Steady-State Free Precession: Comparison with Routine Knee MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1450 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
H A Alhadlaq, Y Xia, J B Moody, and J R Matyas
Detecting structural changes in early experimental osteoarthritis of tibial cartilage by microscopic magnetic resonance imaging and polarised light microscopy
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2004; 63(6): 709 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. E. Gold, T. R. McCauley, M. L. Gray, and D. G. Disler
Special Focus Session: What's New in Cartilage?
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1227 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Link, L. S. Steinbach, S. Ghosh, M. Ries, Y. Lu, N. Lane, and S. Majumdar
Osteoarthritis: MR Imaging Findings in Different Stages of Disease and Correlation with Clinical Findings
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 373 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. R. McCauley and D. G. Disler
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage of the Knee
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2001; 9(1): 2 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. C. Vande Berg, F. E. Lecouvet, P. Poilvache, J. Jamart, R. Materne, B. Lengele, B. Maldague, and J. Malghem
Assessment of Knee Cartilage in Cadavers with Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging
Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 430 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.