American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1125-1131, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation

VS Lee, CE Spritzer, BA Carroll, LG Pool, MA Bernstein, SK Heinle and JR MacFall
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the accuracy of measurements of flow velocity and volume flow rate in an in vitro phantom and in healthy human volunteers using a cardiac-gated, segmented K-space, fast cine phase-contrast (PC) MR imaging technique with view sharing (fast PC). We compared this method with conventional cine PC MR imaging and Doppler sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pulsatile flow was generated in a flow phantom that consisted of a cylindric tube having various degrees of tapered stenosis. Phase-encoded velocity maps were obtained using cine PC and fast PC MR imaging. Doppler sonography was also performed. Measurements of aortic and pulmonary artery peak systolic and minimum diastolic velocity and volume flow rate were then compared in eight healthy volunteers using the three imaging techniques. RESULTS: We found excellent agreement between fast PC and cine PC measurements of peak systolic velocity when regions of interest were drawn to exclude vessel margins (r > .99 for phantom studies, and r = .80 for human studies). Correlation between minimum diastolic velocity measurements by MR imaging was limited by noise that resulted from high encoding velocity settings. However, such correlation improved with signal averaging. When compared with predicted values of volume flow rates, both cine PC (r > .99) and fast PC (r = .97) MR imaging were more accurate than Doppler sonography (r = .78) in vitro. Measurements of cardiac output were adversely affected by low signal to noise, especially during diastole; estimates based on systolic forward flow resulted in better agreement between the two MR imaging methods. CONCLUSION: Fast PC MR flow quantification may prove to be a useful adjunct to routine MR studies for measurements of peak flow velocity. However, estimates of volume flow rate using fast PC MR imaging are limited because of increased noise during low diastolic flow as well as edge artifacts.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.O. Oktar, C. Yucel, D. Karaosmanoglu, K. Akkan, H. Ozdemir, N. Tokgoz, and T. Tali Blood-Flow Volume Quantification in Internal Carotid and Vertebral Arteries: Comparison of 3 Different Ultrasound Techniques with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. P. Salm, S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, J. J. Bax, A. H. Zwinderman, E. E. van der Wall, A. de Roos, and H. J. Lamb Blood Flow in Coronary Artery Bypass Vein Grafts: Volume versus Velocity at Cardiovascular MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 915 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. De Cobelli, P. Fiorina, G. Perseghin, M. Magnone, M. Venturini, G. Zerbini, A. Zanello, G. Mazzolari, L. Monti, V. Di Carlo, et al. L-Arginine-Induced Vasodilation of the Renal Vasculature Is Preserved in Uremic Type 1 Diabetic Patients After Kidney and Pancreas but not After Kidney-Alone Transplantation Diabetes Care, April 1, 2004; 27(4): 947 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Lee, N. M. Rofsky, A. T. Ton, G. Johnson, G. A. Krinsky, and J. C. Weinreb Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Enhanced Phase-Contrast MR Imaging to Measure Renal Artery Velocity Waveforms in Patients with Suspected Renovascular Hypertension Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 499 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]