AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kayne, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poon, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kayne, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1139-1144, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Iliac artery stenosis measurements: comparison of two-dimensional time- of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

E Poon, EK Yucel, H Pagan-Marin and H Kayne
Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, MA 02118, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We compared our ability to make iliac artery measurements on two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with conventional angiography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with lower extremity vascular disease underwent pelvic MR angiography. Parameters of the cardiac- gated axial 2D TOF sequence included a TR/TE of 24/7 msec and a 50 degrees flip angle. Parameters for the three-dimensional MR angiography sequence, in which we obtained 32 coronal 3-mm slices with fat suppression, included a TR/TE of 32/5 msec and a 40 degrees flip angle during infusion of 40 ml of gadolinium-chelated contrast material. Patients then underwent conventional angiography of the iliac arteries. Maximum stenosis in the common iliac, external iliac, and common femoral arteries was then measured. Measurements of stenosis were compared by repeated measures of analysis of variance. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for identification of greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and less than 50% stenosis. RESULTS: For all vessels studied, we found no significant difference in measurements obtained from the gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography technique and those obtained from conventional angiography (p > .05). However, significantly different stenotic measurements were obtained from the 2D TOF MR angiography sequence and conventional angiography. In the external iliac arteries, 2D TOF MR angiography exaggerated stenoses most substantially. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography was more accurate than 2D TOF MR angiography when measuring degree of stenosis in the iliac arteries.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Thurnher, S. Miller, G. Schneider, C. Ballarati, G. Bongartz, C. U. Herborn, S. Schoenberg, M. A. Cova, G. Morana, K. Niazi, et al.
Diagnostic Performance of Gadobenate Dimeglumine Enhanced MR Angiography of the Iliofemoral and Calf Arteries: A Large-Scale Multicenter Trial
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1223 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Sutter, D. Nanz, A. M. Lutz, T. Pfammatter, B. Seifert, A. Struwe, C. Heilmaier, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Assessment of Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: MR Angiography with Parallel Acquisition versus Conventional MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Schaefer, F. P. Boudghene, H. J. Brambs, M. Bret-Zurita, J. L. Caniego, R. A. Coulden, H. B. Gehl, R. Hammerstingl, A. Huber, R. J. Mendez, et al.
Abdominal and Iliac Arterial Stenoses: Comparative Double-blinded Randomized Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D MR Angiography with Gadodiamide or Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 827 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Rapp, S. D. Wolff, S. F. Quinn, J. A. Soto, S. G. Meranze, S. Muluk, J. Blebea, S. P. Johnson, N. M. Rofsky, A. Duerinckx, et al.
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease in Patients with Known or Suspected Peripheral Vascular Disease: Safety and Efficacy of Gadofosveset-enhanced MR Angiography--Multicenter Comparative Phase III Study
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Perreault, M. A. Edelman, R. A. Baum, E. K. Yucel, R. M. Weisskoff, K. Shamsi, and E. R. Mohler III
MR Angiography with Gadofosveset Trisodium for Peripheral Vascular Disease: Phase II Trial
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 811 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. V. Pandharipande, V. S. Lee, P. M. Reuss, H. W. Charles, R. J. Rosen, G. A. Krinsky, J. C. Weinreb, and N. M. Rofsky
Two-Station Bolus-Chase MR Angiography with a Stationary Table: A Simple Alternative to Automated-Table Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1583 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Loewe, M. Schoder, T. Rand, U. Hoffmann, J. Sailer, T. Kos, J. Lammer, and S. Thurnher
Peripheral Vascular Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Moving-Bed MR Angiography Versus Digital Subtraction Angiography in 106 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 1013 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Thurnher, A. Capelastegui, F. H. Del Olmo, R. F. Dondelinger, C. Gervás, A. G. Jassoy, P. Keto, C. Loewe, C. N. Ludman, L. Marti-Bonmati, et al.
Safety and Effectiveness of Single- versus Triple-Dose Gadodiamide Injection- enhanced MR Angiography of the Abdomen: A Phase III Double-Blind Multicenter Study
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 137 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. W. Koelemay, J. G. Lijmer, J. Stoker, D. A. Legemate, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, March 14, 2001; 285(10): 1338 - 1345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Nelemans, T. Leiner, H. C. W. de Vet, and J. M. A. van Engelshoven
Peripheral Arterial Disease: Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of MR Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 105 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Visser and M. G. Myriam Hunink
Peripheral Arterial Disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography versus Color-guided Duplex US-A Meta-analysis
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 67 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. M. Rofsky and M. A. Adelman
MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 325 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. N. Shetty, K. G. Bis, A. J. Duerinckx, and V. R. Narra
Lower Extremity MR Angiography: Universal Retrofitting of High-Field-Strength Systems with Stepping Kinematic Imaging Platforms—Initial Experience
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 284 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.