AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heneghan, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hammers, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heneghan, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hammers, L. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1247-1252, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Transrectal sonography in staging rectal carcinoma: the role of gray- scale, color-flow, and Doppler imaging analysis

JP Heneghan, RR Salem, RC Lange, KJ Taylor and LW Hammers
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8042, USA.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combining gray-scale sonography with color-flow imaging and pulsed Doppler transrectal sonography in the staging of rectal carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with primary rectal carcinoma underwent transrectal sonography. The rectal masses were staged T1-T2 or T3-T4 on the basis of gray-scale imaging. The local nodes were classified as benign or malignant on the basis of size and echogenicity. In 22 patients, color-flow imaging and pulsed Doppler imaging of the rectal mass and of the local lymph nodes were performed. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity were documented, and the resistive index was calculated. RESULTS: Gray-scale imaging alone was used to stage T1-T2 masses with 88% sensitivity and 82% specificity. T3-T4 masses were staged with 82% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Overall accuracy was 85%. Gray-scale imaging of lymph nodes using a discriminatory size of less than or equal to 5 mm for benign nodes and greater than 5 mm for malignant nodes yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 28%, and an accuracy of 52%. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined that a size of greater than or equal to 7 mm was optimal for characterizing nodes. Such a size provided an accuracy of 83%. PSV of less than 25 cm/sec distinguished T3-T4 from T1-T2 rectal masses with 75% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 77% accuracy. A PSV of greater than 20 cm/sec classified a node as malignant with 100% sensitivity, 62% specificity, and 76% accuracy. A resistive index of greater than 0.61 classified a node as malignant with 71% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 80% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Color-flow imaging and pulsed Doppler imaging are useful additions to gray-scale transrectal sonography in staging primary rectal carcinomas. The combination has most value when evaluating perirectal nodes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson
Perspective on the Role of Transrectal and Transvaginal Sonography of Tumors of the Rectum and Anal Canal
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1495 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. Engin
Endosonographic imaging of anorectal diseases.
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 57 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Bipat, A. S. Glas, F. J. M. Slors, A. H. Zwinderman, P. M. M. Bossuyt, and J. Stoker
Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 773 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. J. Telford, J. R. Saltzman, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Syngal
Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 191 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. S. Sudakoff, F. Quiroz, and W. D. Foley
Sonography of Anorectal, Rectal, and Perirectal Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 131 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. Gagliardi, S. Bayar, R. Smith, and R. R. Salem
Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging With External Phase-Arrayed Coils
Arch Surg, April 1, 2002; 137(4): 447 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. B. Kruskal, S. M. Sentovich, and R. A. Kane
Staging of Rectal Cancer after Polypectomy: Usefulness of Endorectal US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 31 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.