AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopka, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopka, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 169, 1573-1578, Copyright © 1997 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Dual-phase helical CT of the kidney: value of the corticomedullary and nephrographic phase for evaluation of renal lesions and preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma

L Kopka, U Fischer, G Zoeller, C Schmidt, RH Ringert and E Grabbe
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate early-phase unenhanced and late-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT in revealing renal lesions and staging renal cell carcinomas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced helical CT of the kidneys was performed in 145 patients who also underwent unenhanced CT. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed in the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP). A total of 173 lesions in 96 patients were proven histologically or cytologically. The performance of helical CT in the three study groups was compared: unenhanced and CMP enhancement, group 1; unenhanced and NP enhancement, group 2; unenhanced, CMP enhancement, and NP enhancement, group 3. Among the parameters evaluated were the sensitivity for helical CT of all 173 renal lesions and the sensitivity and specificity for the 90 malignant tumors. Also, the preoperative CT staging of the 76 renal cell carcinomas was correlated with the pathologic specimens. RESULTS: The sensitivity for detection of all renal lesions in group 1 (84%) was significantly less than in groups 2 and 3 (97% and 100%). The specificity and accuracy of helical CT in revealing renal cell carcinomas were significantly higher (p < .05) in group 3 (95% and 95%, respectively) than in groups 1 (93% and 92%, respectively) and 2 (89% and 91%, respectively). Two renal cell carcinomas were overlooked by the interpreters of the helical scans in group 1. The accuracy of preoperative CT staging of renal cell carcinomas was significantly better (p < .05) in group 3 (91%) than in groups 1 (82%) and 2 (86%). CONCLUSION: When patients underwent unenhanced helical CT, CMP helical CT, and NP helical CT, we achieved a better rate of detection and characterization of renal lesions and better preoperative staging of renal cell carcinomas than when we used either CMP helical CT or NP helical CT alone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. S. Ng, C. G. Wood, P. M. Silverman, N. M. Tannir, P. Tamboli, and C. M. Sandler
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1220 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Beer, M. Dobritz, N. Zantl, G. Weirich, J. Stollfuss, and E. J. Rummeny
Comparison of 16-MDCT and MRI for characterization of kidney lesions.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1639 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Tamai, Y. Takiguchi, M. Oka, N. Shingaki, S. Enomoto, T. Shiraki, M. Furuta, I. Inoue, M. Iguchi, K. Yanaoka, et al.
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Tumors
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1635 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Y. Lee, J. P. Heiken, P. C. Huettner, and W. Na-ChiangMai
Renal Cell Carcinoma Visible Only During the Corticomedullary Phase of Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3_supp): S104 - S106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Roy Sr., S. El Ghali, X. Buy, V. Lindner, H. Lang, C. Saussine, and D. Jacqmin
Significance of the Pseudocapsule on MRI of Renal Neoplasms and Its Potential Application for Local Staging: A Retrospective Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. Uggowitzer, T. Meissnitzer, and G. Ruppert
Differentiation of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Renal Papillary Carcinoma Using Quantitative CT Enhancement Parameters
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1387 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C Walter, M Kruessell, A Gindele, H G Brochhagen, A Gossmann, and P Landwehr
Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 696 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Catalano, F. Fraioli, A. Laghi, A. Napoli, F. Pediconi, M. Danti, P. Nardis, and R. Passariello
High-Resolution Multidetector CT in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1271 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Rydberg, K. K. Kopecky, M. Tann, S. A. Persohn, S. B. Leapman, R. S. Filo, and A. L. Shalhav
Evaluation of Prospective Living Renal Donors for Laparoscopic Nephrectomy with Multisection CT: The Marriage of Minimally Invasive Imaging with Minimally Invasive Surgery
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S223 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Sheth, J. C. Scatarige, K. M. Horton, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of Multidetector CT and Three-dimensional CT
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S237 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Zagoria
Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 945 - 955.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum, J. E. Jacobs, C. P. Langlotz, and P. Ramchandani
Assessment of a Bolus-tracking Technique in Helical Renal CT to Optimize Nephrographic Phase Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.