AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kilcoyne, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kilcoyne, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 19-22, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system

A Larson, DA Lynch, B Zeligman, C Harlow, C Vanoni, G Thieme and R Kilcoyne
Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared conventional thoracic and skeletal radiographs with 12-bit digitized images of the same radiographs in terms of subjective image quality and accuracy of diagnosis of subtle disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six chest radiographs with normal findings, 48 chest radiographs with abnormal findings, 29 skeletal radiographs with normal findings, and 26 skeletal radiographs with abnormal findings were included in this study. The images were chosen for the subtlety of their findings (nodules, pneumothoraces, interstitial lung disease, fractures). Each set of images was laser- digitized and viewed independently by three radiologists at a teleradiology workstation with a 1280 x 1024 pixel matrix monitor equipped with an eight-bit-per-pixel gray-scale display. All images were viewed at maximum resolution. After review of the digitized images for image quality and for the presence of abnormalities, each radiologist analyzed the analog images in a similar way. RESULTS: Sensitivities for detecting nodules, pneumothoraces, and interstitial lung disease on digitized chest radiographs were 58%, 75%, and 90%, respectively, compared with 62%, 79%, and 92%, respectively, on the original radiographs. Sensitivity for fracture detection on digitized bone radiographs was 87% compared with 88% on analog radiographs. None of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Digitization of radiographs for primary diagnosis by teleradiology results in a slight decrease in sensitivity for detection of subtle abnormalities, provided that the images are viewed at maximum resolution.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
R Goga, N. Chandler, and R. Love
Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 33(2): 103 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
G. Demiris
Integration of Telemedicine in Graduate Medical Informatics Education
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2003; 10(4): 310 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Wootton
Recent advances: Telemedicine
BMJ, September 8, 2001; 323(7312): 557 - 560.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Herron, T. M. Bender, W. L. Campbell, J. H. Sumkin, H. E. Rockette, and D. Gur
Effects of Luminance and Resolution on Observer Performance with Chest Radiographs
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.