AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 170, 23-25, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription

DI Rosenthal, FS Chew, DE Dupuy, SV Kattapuram, WE Palmer, RM Yap and LA Levine
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital-White 289, Boston, USA.

OBJECTIVE: We have implemented computerized speech recognition in a high-volume clinical setting using a newly developed commercial software system. This paper compares the performance of the computerized system with conventional transcription during a trial week followed by 3 months of routine clinical use. CONCLUSION: The speech recognition system was used for 97% of the cases during the trial week and 87% of cases during the months of continuous use. For a similar mixture of cases, no change occurred in the length of reports after introduction of the computerized system. Speech recognition decreased the time until the report became available by 99% and resulted in a substantial savings in transcription costs. We conclude that speech recognition by computer is practical in a high-volume clinical implementation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Naik, A. Hanbidge, and S. R. Wilson
Radiology Reports: Examining Radiologist and Clinician Preferences Regarding Style and Content
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 591 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. M. Borowitz
Computer-based Speech Recognition as an Alternative to Medical Transcription
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2001; 8(1): 101 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. R. Ramaswamy, G. Chaljub, O. Esch, D. D. Fanning, and E. vanSonnenberg
Continuous Speech Recognition in MR Imaging Reporting: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Impact
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
N. Ackerman Jr
Computer Recognition of Medical Record Voice Dictations
AAP Grand Rounds, August 1, 1999; 2(2): 22 - 22.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. Hawnaur
Recent advances: Diagnostic radiology
BMJ, July 17, 1999; 319(7203): 168 - 171.
[Full Text]

Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. Zafar, J. M. Overhage, and C. J. McDonald
Continuous Speech Recognition for Clinicians
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1999; 6(3): 195 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.