|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 107-113, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
C Nolte-Ernsting, G Adam, A Bucker, S Berges, A Bjornerud and RW Gunther
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Aachen, Germany.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated and compared two different experimental blood pool contrast agents for abdominal MR angiography in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In seven pigs, coronal T1-weighted three- dimensional fast field-echo images were obtained on a conventional 1.5- T MR imaging system before and after i.v. injection of the ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide agent FeO-BPA. In another seven pigs, MR angiograms were acquired using the gadolinium polymer WIN 22181. Enhanced images were obtained 5-210 min after injection of FeO-BPA and 1-120 min after injection of WIN 22181. RESULTS: Both blood pool agents yielded detailed angiograms of the abdominal vascular tree when imaging lasted 2 min. In-plane running vessels were imaged without saturation effects and with equivalent maximum signal-to-noise ratios. Half the maximum signal-to-noise ratio was reached 150 min after injection of FeO-BPA, whereas this interval was approximately 70 min for the gadolinium polymer. Because of these different imaging half-life periods, the effective diagnostic window provided by FeO-BPA was six to eight times longer than that of WIN 22181. In the liver, the vascular T1 shortening and the parenchymal T2* effect of FeO-BPA complemented each other, resulting in an optimal contrast-to-noise ratio significantly higher than that achieved with WIN 22181. This "double- contrast effect" in the liver was especially helpful when obtaining detailed MR portograms. CONCLUSION: The blood pool agents FeO-BPA and WIN 22181 can be used to produce high-quality abdominal MR angiograms on standard MR imaging equipment. The contrast-to-noise ratio of hepatic vessels is best on iron oxide-enhanced images because of a T1- T2* synergistic effect in the liver. The longer diagnostic window provided by FeO-BPA coupled with the option of in-plane imaging suggests the usefulness of FeO-BPA in future MR imaging-guided vascular interventions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. N. Gandhi, M. A. Brown, J. G. Wong, D. A. Aguirre, and C. B. Sirlin MR Contrast Agents for Liver Imaging: What, When, How RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1621 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. K. Wacker, K. Reither, W. Ebert, M. Wendt, J. S. Lewin, and K.-J. Wolf MR Image-guided Endovascular Procedures with the Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide SH U 555 C as an Intravascular Contrast Agent: Study in Pigs Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 459 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-M. Larsson, P. Sunden, C.-G. Olsson, J. Debatin, A. J. Duerinckx, R. Baum, D. Hahn, and F. Ebner MR Venography Using an Intravascular Contrast Agent: Results from a Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Dosage Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2003; 180(1): 227 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Glockner Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography: Applications for Abdominal Imaging RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 357 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Weishaupt, S. G. Ruhm, C. A. Binkert, M. Schmidt, M. A. Patak, F. Steybe, S. McGill, and J. F. Debatin Equilibrium-Phase MR Angiography of the Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries Using a Blood Pool Contrast Agent Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 189 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Clarke, H.-J. Weinmann, E. Dai, A. R. Lucas, and B. K. Rutt Comparison of Two Blood Pool Contrast Agents for 0.5-T MR Angiography: Experimental Study in Rabbits Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 787 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Ahlström, L. O. Johansson, J. B. Rodenburg, A. S. Ragnarsson, P. Åkeson, and A. Börseth Pulmonary MR Angiography with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles as a Blood Pool Agent and a Navigator Echo for Respiratory Gating: Pilot Study Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 865 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |