AJR Get Involved! Great Benefits! Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 171, 1671-1678, Copyright © 1998 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Predictive value of specimen radiography for core needle biopsy of noncalcified breast masses

WA Berg, B Jaeger, C Campassi and D Kumar
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the predictive value of specimen radiography for large core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of noncalcified breast masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four biopsies of 83 breast masses yielded 403 specimens. Specimens showing dense material on specimen radiography were predicted to be diagnostic; specimens showing intermediate- or low-density material were predicted to be nondiagnostic. Specimen radiographic and histopathologic findings were correlated for each specimen using vital dyes to mark individual specimens. RESULTS: Of the 403 specimens, 307 (76%) contained diagnostic material representative of the lesion, with a specific diagnosis achieved for 82 (99%) of 83 lesions (62 benign, 20 malignant). Of the 293 passes containing dense material, 268 (91%) proved to be diagnostic; 11 (18%) of 62 specimens containing only low- density material proved to be diagnostic. Of the 25 (9%) of 293 specimens containing radiographically dense but nondiagnostic material, 18 (72%) showed focal fibrosis and had missed the lesion; 15 (83%) of 18 such specimens were obtained in dense parenchyma. The positive predictive value of specimen radiography was 13 (100%) of 13 in fatty breasts; 77 (96%) of 80 in breasts with minimal scattered fibroglandular elements; 91 (94%) of 97 in heterogeneously dense breasts; and 35 (70%) of 50 in breasts with extremely dense parenchyma. Of the 16 lesions sampled stereotactically, specimen radiography helped assess the inadequacy of initial sampling in three (19%). In six (9%) of 68 sonographically guided biopsies, only one or two specimens could be obtained; specimen radiography helped us predict whether material was adequate for diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Radiography of core specimens obtained from noncalcified breast masses accurately reveals the adequacy of sampling unless the breast parenchyma is extremely dense. Such immediate assessment can help ensure adequate material from lesions that are difficult to biopsy and can thereby improve the diagnostic yield of large core needle breast biopsy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and K. K. Oh
Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill, O. B. Ioffe, and W. A. Berg
When Is a Diagnosis of Sclerosing Adenosis Acceptable at Core Biopsy?
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. E. Fishman, C. Milikowski, R. Ramsinghani, M. V. Velasquez, and G. Aviram
US-guided Core-Needle Biopsy of the Breast: How Many Specimens Are Necessary?
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 779 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Wunderbaldinger, G. Wolf, K. Turetschek, and T. H. Helbich
Comparison of Sitting Versus Prone Position for Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy in Surgically Proven Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1221 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill and W. A. Berg
Case 39: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 132 - 136.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, H. E. Mrose, and O. B. Ioffe
Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Breast Biopsy
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 503 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, C. L. Arnoldus, E. Teferra, and M. Bhargavan
Biopsy of Amorphous Breast Calcifications: Pathologic Outcome and Yield at Stereotactic Biopsy
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 495 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.