AJR Custom publishing of AJR articles and ARRS Cat. Course
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moon, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, I. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moon, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, I. O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 172, 713-716, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Intracranial germinomas: correlation of imaging findings with tumor response to radiation therapy

WK Moon, KH Chang, MH Han and IO Kim
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Korea.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to correlate imaging characteristics of intracranial germinomas with response to radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using tumor size at the completion of irradiation, we classified 23 patients with histologically proven germinomas in the pineal gland (n = 6), the suprasellar region (n = 7), and the basal ganglia (n = 10) into two groups: excellent response group (n = 14) and good response group (n = 9). Excellent response was defined as complete resolution or residual tumor less than 1.0 cm in diameter, and good response was defined as residual tumor of 1.0-3.0 cm in diameter. CT (n = 53) and MR (n = 32) images obtained before, during, and after radiation therapy were retrospectively analyzed with particular attention to the location, size, presence of cystic change, and CSF seeding of the tumors. RESULTS: In all 23 patients, the tumors decreased 85-100% in size at the completion of irradiation with 40-56 Gy. A significant factor in the different responses to irradiation between patients in the excellent and good response groups was cystic change of the tumor. Tumors with cystic components responded more slowly and had larger residual lesions than did tumors without cystic components (p < .01). In eight of 12 cystic tumors, the cystic portion of the tumor responded more slowly than did the solid portion and remained visible on imaging 6-12 months after irradiation. We found no significant differences between the two groups in location, size, and CSF seeding of tumors. In 12 patients with residual lesions at the completion of irradiation, the tumors proceeded to resolve after completion of treatment. CONCLUSION: In our study, tumor response to radiation therapy correlated negatively with the presence of a cystic region.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.