|
|
||||||||
American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 227-229, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society
ARTICLES |
B Won, HE Reynolds, CL Lazaridis and VP Jackson
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum- assisted biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 consecutive lesions that had been diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ using stereotactic needle biopsy. The first 21 lesions had been biopsied using a 14-gauge automated gun; the remaining 20 lesions, using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Surgical histopathologic results at lumpectomy were compared with the findings at needle biopsy and defined as either concordant, when only ductal carcinoma in situ (i.e., no evidence of invasive carcinoma) was evident at surgery, or discordant, when invasive carcinoma was found. One patient from the automated gun group was lost to follow-up and was not included in the analysis. RESULTS: Invasive carcinoma was found at surgery in seven (35%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the automated gun compared with three (15%) of the 20 cases diagnosed using the vacuum-assisted device (p = .13). In all three of these discordant vacuum-assisted cases, only microinvasive disease was found at surgery. However, in only two of the seven discordant automated gun cases was only microinvasive disease found at surgery. CONCLUSION: The 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy technique may improve the accuracy of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. Underestimation of disease still occurs, however.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. P. Lourenco, M. B. Mainiero, E. Lazarus, D. Giri, and B. Schepps Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Histologic Underestimation Rates with 11- and 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): W275 - W279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Lomoschitz, T. H. Helbich, M. Rudas, G. Pfarl, K. F. Linnau, A. Stadler, and R. J. Jackman Stereotactic 11-gauge Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Influence of Number of Specimens on Diagnostic Accuracy Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, R. J. Hooley, and C. H. Lee Comparison of Automated Versus Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Methods for Sonographically Guided Core Biopsy of the Breast Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 347 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman, J. B. Kaplan, E. A. Morris, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, and D. D. Dershaw To Excise or To Sample the Mammographic Target: What Is the Goal of Stereotactic II-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy? Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 679 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Georgian-Smith, C. D'Orsi, E. Morris, C. F. Clark Jr., E. Liberty, and C. D. Lehman Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 1017 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman, S. L. Goodstine, D. D. Dershaw, E. A. Morris, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and K. J. V. Zee One Operation After Percutaneous Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Frequency and Associated Factors Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 673 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Brem, J. M. Schoonjans, S. N. Goodman, A. Nolten, F. B. Askin, and O. M. B. Gatewood Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Percutaneous Diagnosis with 11- and 8-gauge Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy Devices Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 793 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Jackman, F. Burbank, S. H. Parker, W. P. Evans III, M. C. Lechner, T. R. Richardson, A. A. Smid, H. B. Borofsky, C. H. Lee, H. M. Goldstein, et al. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy of Nonpalpable Lesions: Determinants of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Underestimation Rates Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 497 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Lee, D. Carter, L. E. Philpotts, M. E. Couce, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, and I. Tocino Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed with Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Can Invasion Be Predicted? Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 466 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. R. Darling, D. N. Smith, S. C. Lester, C. Kaelin, D.-L. G. Selland, C. M. Denison, P. J. DiPiro, D. I. Rose, E. Rhei, and J. E. Meyer Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ as Revealed by Large-Core Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of Surgical Excision Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1341 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Philpotts, C. H. Lee, L. J. Horvath, R. C. Lange, D. Carter, and I. Tocino Underestimation of Breast Cancer with II-Gauge Vacuum Suction Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1047 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman and M. P. Sama Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic 11-Gauge Directional Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liberman Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |