AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, J. D., 2nd
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 279-284, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Morality, ethics, and radiologists' responsibilities

JD Armstrong 2nd
The Program in Health Care Ethics, Humanities, and Law, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.

The goal of this discussion was to address the matter and methodology of ethics and critical thinking and to ask several questions about the relationship between ethics and radiology. Questions about the nature of the moral and how ethics inform decision making raise our awareness and may provide new understanding about moral thinking. Why is medicine a moral endeavor? Overridingness, universalizability, and other- regarding virtues were discussed. How do ethics inform medical decision making? Ethical theories, including parentalism, autonomy, and the engagement model, were discussed. What are radiologists' ethical responsibilities? Our ethical responsibilities as radiologists entail seven briefly described elements: assessing the appropriateness of the imaging examination, participating in the informed consent process, protecting patient interests, providing excellent image interpretation, communicating effectively with physicians and patients, seeking continued learning, and continuously improving quality. Of these responsibilities, competence, loyal concern for the patient's well- being, and respect for his or her person provide the basis for trust in the patient-physician relationship. If the central paradox in medicine is the tension between self-interest and altruism, then responsibility to the patient in this trust has the greatest force and overrides other obligations. Finally, our challenge is to critically examine our and each other's professional role and the extent to which we achieve excellence in our contribution to patient care; to break out of comfortable habits and reflect on new, alternative ways of knowing as caregivers; to think about what we are doing in medicine and the consequences for the human mind and spirit of our patients, our colleagues, and ourselves; and to provide a forum for this important dialogue in our practices, residency programs, and continuing education curricula.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
B Hofmann and K B Lysdahl
Moral principles and medical practice: the role of patient autonomy in the extensive use of radiological services
J. Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 34(6): 446 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Oljeski, M. J. Homer, and W. S. Krackov
Incorporating Ethics Education into the Radiology Residency Curriculum: A Model
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 569 - 571.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.