American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 583-590, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis

MB Sheridan, J Ward, JA Guthrie, JA Spencer, CM Craven, D Wilson, PJ Guillou and PJ Robinson
Department of Clinical Radiology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare dynamic contrast- enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive surgical candidates (20 men, 13 women; 39-81 years old) were included. MR imaging comprised fast spin- echo (TR/TE 4000/91), fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo (500/15), and T1-weighted breath-hold gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (100/4; flip angle, 80 degrees) images before and after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Helical CT used 5-mm collimation with a pitch of 1:1.5-1.7; images were obtained 20 and 65-70 sec after injection of 150 ml of contrast material. Two pairs of interpreters who were unaware of the results of the other imaging method independently scored each examination for the presence of a lesion and for surgical resectability using a five-point scale. Results were correlated with surgery (n = 25) or consensus review (n = 8). Receiver operating characteristic methodology was used to analyze the results for resectability, and positive predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: Both MR imaging and helical CT revealed 29 of 31 lesions. In determining lesion resectability, the mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.96 and 0.81 (p = .01) and the positive predictive values were 86.5% and 76% (p = .02) for MR imaging and helical CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: MR imaging and helical CT performed equally well in lesion detection. MR imaging was significantly better in the assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumors.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Furukawa, K. Uesaka, and N. Boku Treatment Decision Making in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Multidisciplinary Team Discussion With Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Arch Surg, March 1, 2008; 143(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Y. Yang, T. D. Wagner, M. Fuss, and C. R. Thomas Jr. Multimodality Approaches for Pancreatic Cancer CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2005; 55(6): 352 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Birchard, R. C. Semelka, W. B. Hyslop, A. Brown, D. Armao, Z. Firat, and G. Vaidean Suspected Pancreatic Cancer: Evaluation by Dynamic Gadolinium-Enhanced 3D Gradient-Echo MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2005; 185(3): 700 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Morganti, M. G. Brizi, G. Macchia, G. Sallustio, G. Costamagna, S. Alfieri, G. C. Mattiucci, V. Valentini, L. Natale, F. Deodato, et al. The Prognostic Effect of Clinical Staging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 12(2): 145 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Manoharan and M B Sheridan Neoplasms of the pancreas Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gangi, J. G. Fletcher, M. A. Nathan, J. A. Christensen, W. S. Harmsen, B. S. Crownhart, and S. T. Chari Time Interval Between Abnormalities Seen on CT and the Clinical Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Retrospective Review of CT Scans Obtained Before Diagnosis Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 897 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. L. Bronstein, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, H. Choi, C. David, R. A. DuBrow, L. D. Broemeling, K. R. Cleary, and C. Charnsangavej Detection of Small Pancreatic Tumors with Multiphasic Helical CT Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 619 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Romagnuolo, M. Bardou, E. Rahme, L. Joseph, C. Reinhold, and A. N. Barkun Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 547 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Ozawa, K. Numata, K. Tanaka, N. Ueno, T. Kiba, K. Hara, M. Morimoto, T. Sakaguchi, H. Sekihara, T. Kubota, et al. Contrast-Enhanced Sonography of Small Pancreatic Mass Lesions J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2002; 21(9): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Yoshimitsu, H. Honda, K. Shinozaki, H. Aibe, T. Kuroiwa, H. Irie, K. Chijiiwa, Y. Asayama, and K. Masuda Helical CT of the Local Spread of Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Evaluation According to the TNM System in Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Lopez Hanninen, H. Amthauer, N. Hosten, J. Ricke, M. Bohmig, J. Langrehr, R. Hintze, P. Neuhaus, B. Wiedenmann, S. Rosewicz, et al. Prospective Evaluation of Pancreatic Tumors: Accuracy of MR Imaging with MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 34 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]