AJR AJR Reprints & E-prints Available. Order Today!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by deSouza, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by McIver, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by deSouza, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by McIver, D. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 723-728, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

Transanal MR imaging after repair of anorectal anomalies in children: appearances in pull-through versus posterior sagittal reconstructions

NM deSouza, HC Ward, AD Williams, M Battin, DN Harris and DK McIver
Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to use transanal MR imaging to compare the anatomic appearance of the components of the anal sphincter and the pattern of scarring after a pull-through perineoplasty versus a posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen children ranging in age from 10 months to 15 years (mean, 10 years) were imaged using transanal receiver coils appropriate to the size of the child. Five had low, four intermediate, and seven high anomalies. Seven had undergone a transanal pull-through procedure, and nine had undergone posterior sagittal reconstruction. The integrity of the muscles was assessed on T1-weighted and short inversion time inversion recovery transverse and coronal images using a qualitative MR imaging score. The pattern of scarring was also assessed. RESULTS: In the transanal pull-through group, four of seven patients showed external sphincter deficiency. A circumferential low-signal-intensity band was seen inferior to the sphincter in six patients. All posterior sagittal reconstructions had a long posterior midline scar. Five of nine patients showed external sphincter deficiency, whereas a further two had internal sphincter deficiency. No differences were seen in MR imaging scores for each operative procedure for all grades of severity of anorectal anomaly. However, a comparison between high and intermediate anomalies showed a small improvement in MR imaging score using the transanal pull-through procedure (Mann-Whitney U test = 3, p < .03). Manometric pressures obtained in 13 patients were poor. CONCLUSION: Transanal MR imaging identifies focal defects and patterns of scarring of the anal sphincter complex in infants and children and provides valuable information about individual muscle components.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.