AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barboriak, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacFall, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barboriak, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by MacFall, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 1091-1096, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society

ARTICLES

White matter lesion contrast in fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: effect of varying effective echo time and echo train length

DP Barboriak, JM Provenzale and JR MacFall
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether the contrast between white matter lesions and normal-appearing white matter in fast spin-echo fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images can be improved by lengthening the effective TE and the echo train length. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with various white matter lesions were imaged using fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences (TR = 10,002 msec; inversion time = 2200) on a 1.5-T MR imaging system. For 14 patients, fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences with a TE of 165 msec and echo train length of 32 (fast spin-echo FLAIR 165/32) were compared with fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences with a TE of 125 msec and echo train length of 24 (fast spin- echo FLAIR 125/24). For 16 other patients, fast spin-echo FLAIR 165/32 sequences were compared with fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences with a TE of 145 msec and echo train length of 28 (fast spin-echo FLAIR 145/28). Signal difference-to-noise ratios were calculated between the lesions and normal-appearing white matter for a typical lesion in each patient. RESULTS: In both groups, a small but statistically significant increase in the signal difference-to-noise ratio was found on the fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences using the longer TE and echo train length. In the first group, signal difference-to-noise ratio increased from 18.7 +/- 4.7 (mean +/- SD) for fast spin-echo FLAIR 125/24 to 20.1 +/- 4.5 for fast spin-echo FLAIR 165/32 (p < .05). In the second group, the signal difference-to-noise ratio increased from 15.4 +/- 4.0 for fast spin- echo FLAIR 145/28 to 16.8 +/- 4.6 for fast spin-echo FLAIR 165/32 (p <.01). In addition, fast spin-echo FLAIR sequences with a longer TE and echo train length were obtained more rapidly (6 min for fast spin-echo FLAIR 125/24, 5 min 20 sec for fast spin-echo FLAIR 145/28, and 4 min 41 sec for fast spin-echo FLAIR 165/32). CONCLUSION: Lengthening the TE to 165 msec and echo train length to 32 in fast spin-echo FLAIR imaging allows both a mild improvement in the contrast between white matter lesions and normal-appearing white matter and shorter imaging times.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. R. Melhem and R. Itoh
Effect of T1 Relaxation Time on Lesion Contrast Enhancement in FLAIR MR Imaging: A Study Using Computer-Generated Brain Maps
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 537 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.