AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchberger, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dunser, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchberger, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dunser, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol 173, 921-927, Copyright © 1999 by American Roentgen Ray Society


ARTICLES

Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup

W Buchberger, P DeKoekkoek-Doll, P Springer, P Obrist and M Dunser
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how often physician-performed high-resolution sonography can detect nonpalpable breast lesions not revealed by mammography. A sonographic classification scheme was tested for its accuracy in predicting malignancy of incidentally detected breast lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six thousand one hundred thirteen asymptomatic women with breast density grades 2-4 and 687 patients with palpable or mammographically detected breast masses underwent sonography as an adjunct to mammography. All sonographically detected, clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions that were not simple cysts were prospectively classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant categories. Diagnoses were confirmed by sonographically guided fine- needle aspiration or core needle biopsy. RESULTS: In 6113 asymptomatic women, 23 malignancies in 21 patients were detected with sonography only (prevalence, 0.31%). Five additional malignant lesions were found in patients with a malignant (n = 3) or a benign (n = 2) palpable or mammographically detected index lesion. The mean size of invasive malignancies detected only by sonography was 9.1 mm, which was not significantly different from the mean size of invasive cancers detected by mammography (p = .07). The sensitivity of the prospective sonographic classification for malignancy was 100%, and the specificity was 33.5%. CONCLUSION: The use of high-resolution sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts may lead to detection of a significant number of otherwise occult malignancies that are no different in size from nonpalpable mammographically detected lesions. Prospective classification of these lesions based on sonographic characteristics results in a significant reduction in number of unnecessary biopsies performed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. M. Kavanagh, G. B. Byrnes, C. Nickson, J. N. Cawson, G. G. Giles, J. L. Hopper, D. M. Gertig, and D. R. English
Using Mammographic Density to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2818 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E.-K. Kim, K. H. Ko, K. K. Oh, J. Y. Kwak, J. K. You, M. J. Kim, and B.-W. Park
Clinical Application of the BI-RADS Final Assessment to Breast Sonography in Conjunction with Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1209 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Honjo, J. Ando, T. Tsukioka, H. Morikubo, M. Ichimura, M. Sunagawa, T. Hasegawa, T. Watanabe, T. Kodama, K. Tominaga, et al.
Relative and Combined Performance of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: a Pilot Study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 37(9): 715 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Lehman, C. Isaacs, M. D. Schnall, E. D. Pisano, S. M. Ascher, P. T. Weatherall, D. A. Bluemke, D. J. Bowen, P. K. Marcom, D. K. Armstrong, et al.
Cancer Yield of Mammography, MR, and US in High-Risk Women: Prospective Multi-Institution Breast Cancer Screening Study
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 381 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Graf, T. H. Helbich, G. Hopf, C. Graf, and E. A. Sickles
Probably Benign Breast Masses at US: Is Follow-up an Acceptable Alternative to Biopsy?
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 87 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Y.-W. Chang, K. H. Kwon, D. E. Goo, D. L. Choi, H. K. Lee, and S. B. Yang
Sonographic Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Cystic Lesions of the Breast
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, S. Y. Park, H. K. Jung, K. K. Oh, and J. Y. Seok
Galactoceles Mimicking Suspicious Solid Masses on Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2006; 25(2): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg
Sonographically Depicted Breast Clustered Microcysts: Is Follow-Up Appropriate?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 952 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, Y. H. Choe, S.-J. Nam, W. Park, and Y.-H. Im
Ultrasonographic Detection of Occult Cancer in Patients After Surgical Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 643 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher
Screening for Breast Cancer
JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
O. Graf, T. H. Helbich, M. H. Fuchsjaeger, G. Hopf, M. Morgun, C. Graf, R. Mallek, and E. A. Sickles
Follow-up of Palpable Circumscribed Noncalcified Solid Breast Masses at Mammography and US: Can Biopsy Be Averted?
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 850 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Georgian-Smith, B. Kricun, G. McKee, E. Yeh, E. A. Rafferty, H. A. D'Alessandro, and D. B. Kopans
The Mammary Hamartoma: Appreciation of Additional Imaging Characteristics
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2004; 23(10): 1267 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. B. Kopans
Sonography Should Not Be Used for Breast Cancer Screening Until Its Efficacy Has Been Proven Scientifically
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 489 - 491.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. A. Morris, L. Liberman, D. J. Ballon, M. Robson, A. F. Abramson, A. Heerdt, and D. D. Dershaw
MRI of Occult Breast Carcinoma in a High-Risk Population
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 619 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Crystal, S. D. Strano, S. Shcharynski, and M. J. Koretz
Using Sonography to Screen Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 177 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, D. Saslow, K. Andrews Sawyer, W. Burke, M. E. Costanza, W. P. Evans III, R. S. Foster Jr., E. Hendrick, H. J. Eyre, and S. Sener
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2003; 53(3): 141 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A M Bosch, A G H Kessels, G L Beets, K L C G Vranken, A C Borstlap, M F von Meyenfeldt, and J M A van Engelshoven
Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2003; 76(905): 328 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, A. F. Abramson, and L. K. Tan
MR Imaging of the Ipsilateral Breast in Women with Percutaneously Proven Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 901 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, C. I. Campassi, and O. B. Ioffe
Cystic Lesions of the Breast: Sonographic-Pathologic Correlation
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 183 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. P. Jackson
Screening Mammography: Controversies and Headlines
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 323 - 326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J. H. Newhouse
Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 165 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Moy, P. J. Slanetz, R. Moore, S. Satija, E. D. Yeh, K. A. McCarthy, D. Hall, M. Staffa, E. A. Rafferty, E. Halpern, et al.
Specificity of Mammography and US in the Evaluation of a Palpable Abnormality: Retrospective Review
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 176 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Hall and S. S. Kaplan
Screening Breast US * Dr Kaplan responds:
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 930 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
Multifocal, Multicentric, and Contralateral Breast Cancers: Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. K. Moon, J. S. Myung, Y. J. Lee, I. A. Park, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
US of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 269 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. S. Kaplan
Clinical Utility of Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Evaluation of Women with Dense Breast Tissue
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 641 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.